CVE-2018-21049
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedAn issue was discovered on Samsung mobile devices with N(7.x) and O(8.X) (Exynos chipsets) software. There is an arbitrary memory write in a Trustlet because a secure driver allows access to sensitive APIs. The Samsung ID is SVE-2018-12881 (November 2018).
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceA critical arbitrary memory write vulnerability exists in the Trustlet (Trusted Execution Environment component) on Samsung mobile devices with Exynos chipsets running Android N (7.x) and O (8.X). A secure driver improperly exposes sensitive APIs, allowing an attacker to write to arbitrary memory locations in the trusted zone, potentially achieving code execution with the highest privileges and bypassing hardware-backed security mechanisms.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 7.0= 7.1.0= 7.1.1= 7.1.2= 8.0= 8.1CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify device manufacturer and chipsetCheck if the device is a Samsung model using an Exynos chipset. This information is typically available in device settings under 'About phone' or through 'getprop' commands querying 'ro.product.brand' and 'ro.hardware' or 'ro.chipname'.Affected if The device is a Samsung device with an Exynos (or Samsung Exynos) chipset.
-
Verify Android versionCheck the Android OS version on the device. On the device, go to Settings > About phone > Android version, or use 'getprop ro.build.version.release'. Compare the version against the affected list.Affected if The Android version is exactly 7.0, 7.1.0, 7.1.1, 7.1.2, 8.0, or 8.1.
-
Confirm Trustlet/TEE is activeVerify that the Trusted Execution Environment (TEE) component is present and active on the device. This is typically enabled by default on Exynos devices. Check via 'dmesg' for TEE-related kernel messages or examine /dev/tee* device nodes.Affected if The device has an active TEE/Trustlet component (this is the default state on affected Exynos devices).
If the device is a Samsung model with an Exynos chipset running Android 7.0, 7.1.0-7.1.2, or 8.0-8.1 with TEE enabled, the device is likely affected by this arbitrary memory write vulnerability in the Trustlet secure driver.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedApply Samsung firmware updates (SVE-2018-12881) to affected devices. Organizations should inventory Exynos-based Samsung devices running Android N/O and prioritize patch deployment through enterprise mobile management or carrier updates.
Samsung security patch released November 2018 or later (specific patch level varies by device model)
- Check your Samsung device model and current Android/security patch version in Settings > About phone > Software information
- Visit the Samsung Security Portal at security.samsungmobile.com and look for SVE-2018-12881 to identify the specific security patch level that contains the fix
- Apply the latest available Samsung security update for your device model - go to Settings > Software update > Download and install
- If no update is available from Samsung for your specific device model, consider replacing the device as this is a critical vulnerability with arbitrary memory write capability
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation8.0 h
- Implementation2.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,672.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2018-21049 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2018-21049 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data