CVE-2018-21051
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedAn issue was discovered on Samsung mobile devices with N(7.x) and O(8.x) (Exynos chipsets) software. There is an invalid free in the fingerprint Trustlet, leading to arbitrary code execution. The Samsung ID is SVE-2018-12853 (October 2018).
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceA memory corruption vulnerability exists in the fingerprint Trustlet (trusted application) on Samsung mobile devices running Android N (7.x) and O (8.x) on Exynos chipsets. The issue is an invalid free (use-after-free condition) in the fingerprint authentication subsystem, which can be exploited to achieve arbitrary code execution with elevated (Trustlet) privileges.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 7.0= 7.1.0= 7.1.1= 7.1.2= 8.0= 8.1CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Confirm device is a Samsung mobile phoneCheck the device manufacturer through Settings > About Phone or by running 'getprop ro.product.manufacturer' or 'getprop ro.product.brand' in ADB shellAffected if Device is not made by Samsung, the vulnerability does not apply
-
Verify the device uses an Exynos chipsetCheck the chipset through Settings > About Phone > CPU/Microprocessor or by running 'getprop ro.hardware' or 'cat /proc/cpuinfo' in ADB shell; Exynos variants typically show 'exynos' in the hardware propertyAffected if Device uses a Qualcomm/Snapdragon or other non-Exynos chipset, this specific vulnerability does not apply
-
Check the Android OS versionNavigate to Settings > About Phone > Android version or run 'getprop ro.build.version.release' in ADB shellAffected if Version is NOT 7.0, 7.1.0, 7.1.1, 7.1.2, 8.0, or 8.1, the device is not in the affected version range
-
Confirm fingerprint authentication is enrolled or in useCheck if fingerprint is set up by going to Settings > Lock screen and security > Fingerprint or run 'dumpsys fingerprint' in ADB shell to see fingerprint enrollment statusAffected if Fingerprint authentication is not enrolled or the fingerprint sensor is not used, the vulnerable Trustlet code path is not triggered
-
Check Samsung security patch level dateNavigate to Settings > About Phone > Security patch level or run 'getprop ro.build.version.security_patch' in ADB shellAffected if The security patch level is earlier than October 2018, the device is likely still running the vulnerable unpatched fingerprint Trustlet
A Samsung device with an Exynos chipset running Android 7.0-8.1 with fingerprint enrolled and a security patch level before October 2018 is likely affected by this CVE.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedApply the Samsung security update (SVE-2018-12853) released October 2018 or later, which patches the vulnerable fingerprint Trustlet. Devices should be updated to the latest Samsung security patch level.
October 2018 Samsung Security Patch (SVE-2018-12853) or later monthly security update
- Check the current Android security patch level on the Samsung device (Settings > About phone > Security patch level)
- Verify if the device has received the October 2018 Samsung security update or later
- If not patched, check for system updates in Settings > Software update > Download and install
- If no update is available through OTA, contact the device carrier or Samsung support for patch availability
- For enterprise-managed devices, deploy the latest Samsung security patch via MDM or firmware management tools
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation8.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $6,304.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2018-21051 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2018-21051 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data