CVE-2018-2395
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedUnder certain conditions a malicious user may retrieve information on SAP Internet Graphic Server (IGS), 7.20, 7.20EXT, 7.45, 7.49, 7.53, overwrite existing image or corrupt other type of files.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceA vulnerability in SAP Internet Graphic Server (IGS) versions 7.20, 7.20EXT, 7.45, 7.49, and 7.53 allows a malicious user under certain conditions to retrieve sensitive information from the server, overwrite existing image files, and corrupt other file types on the system.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 7.20= 7.20ext= 7.45= 7.49= 7.53CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Verify SAP IGS installationCheck for running SAP Internet Graphics Server processes or look for IGS-related services in your SAP system landscapeAffected if SAP IGS is not installed on the system
-
Identify installed IGS versionUse SAP transaction code SM51 to list running SAP instances and their versions, or check the IGS installation directory for version informationAffected if The installed version matches 7.20, 7.20EXT, 7.45, 7.49, or 7.53 exactly
-
Confirm IGS is exposedVerify that the SAP IGS service is accessible over network ports (typically HTTP/HTTPS ports for the ICM/IGS)Affected if IGS is network-accessible without proper access restrictions
-
Review IGS file handling configurationInspect SAP IGS configuration files for settings related to image file processing and file access permissionsAffected if IGS is configured to allow external file operations without proper restrictions
You are affected if SAP Internet Graphics Server is installed and the installed version is exactly 7.20, 7.20EXT, 7.45, 7.49, or 7.53 with the service accessible to users
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataRestrict access to the SAP IGS to trusted users only, and apply the relevant SAP security patches for this vulnerability.
- Consultation8.0 h
- Implementation12.0 h
- Testing8.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $9,088.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2018-2395 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2018-2395 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data