SapscoreApplication · Sap

CVE-2018-2484

HIGH · 8.8 CVSS v3.1 Published 2019-01-08
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
94/100
Remediation priority · Urgent
Remotely reachable Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
SAP Enterprise Financial Services (fixed in SAPSCORE 1.13, 1.14, 1.15; S4CORE 1.01, 1.02, 1.03; EA-FINSERV 1.10, 2.0, 5.0, 6.0, 6.03, 6.04, 6.05, 6.06, 6.16, 6.17, 6.18, 8.0; Bank/CFM 4.63_20) does not perform necessary authorization checks for an authenticated user, resulting in escalation of privileges.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

SAP Enterprise Financial Services contains an authorization bypass vulnerability where authenticated users can escalate privileges by bypassing necessary authorization checks. This allows standard users to gain elevated access to financial functions and data they should not have permission to view or modify.

MitigationApply the appropriate SAP patches (SAPSCORE 1.13+, S4CORE 1.01+, EA-FINSERV 6.18+/8.0, or Bank/CFM 4.63_20) and verify that authorization roles are correctly configured to enforce proper segregation of duties.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
SapscoreApplication
Affected:= 1.13= 1.14= 1.15
S4coreApplication
Affected:= 1.01= 1.02= 1.03
Ea FinservApplication
Affected:= 1.10= 2.0= 5.0= 6.0= 6.03= 6.04= 6.05= 6.06= 6.16= 6.17= 6.18= 8.0
Bank\/cfmApplication
Affected:= 4.63_20

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
Low
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify SAP Sapscore version
    Execute transaction code SMDA or use SAPMMC to view installed SAP Sapscore component version, or check the SAP System Version information via transaction SM37
    Affected if Installed version equals 1.13, 1.14, or 1.15
  2. Identify SAP S4core version
    Execute transaction code SMDA or use SAPMMC to view installed S/4HANA core component version, or check the SAP System Version via transaction SM37
    Affected if Installed version equals 1.01, 1.02, or 1.03
  3. Identify SAP EA Finserv version
    Execute transaction code SPAM or SAINT to view installed Enterprise Architecture Financial Services component version, or check via transaction SM30 for table version information
    Affected if Installed version equals 1.10, 2.0, 5.0, 6.0, 6.03, 6.04, 6.05, 6.06, 6.16, 6.17, 6.18, or 8.0
  4. Identify SAP Bank/CFM version
    Execute transaction code SPAM or SAINT to view installed Banking/CFM component version, or check via transaction SM30 for table version information
    Affected if Installed version equals 4.63_20
  5. Verify authorization role configuration
    Review SAP financial authorization roles using transaction PFCG to check if role assignments properly restrict access to financial functions and data per segregation of duties requirements
    Affected if Roles grant excessive privileges or lack proper authorization checks for financial transactions

Your environment is affected if any of the SAP components (Sapscore, S4core, EA Finserv, or Bank/CFM) are running at the specific versions listed AND standard authenticated users can access financial functions beyond their intended authorization level.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Apply the appropriate SAP patches (SAPSCORE 1.13+, S4CORE 1.01+, EA-FINSERV 6.18+/8.0, or Bank/CFM 4.63_20) and verify that authorization roles are correctly configured to enforce proper segregation of duties.

Fix this in Sapscore Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation4.0 h
  • Implementation8.0 h
  • Testing6.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
20.0 hours of engineering $3,500
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,600.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2018-2484 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2018-2484 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data