CVE-2018-3591
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedIn Android before security patch level 2018-04-05 on Qualcomm Snapdragon Mobile and Snapdragon Wear MDM9206, MDM9607, MDM9635M, MDM9650, MDM9655, SD 210/SD 212/SD 205, SD 410/12, SD 425, SD 427, SD 430, SD 435, SD 450, SD 615/16/SD 415, SD 625, SD 650/52, SD 820, SD 835, SD 845, SDM630, SDM636, SDM660, Snapdragon_High_Med_2016, the default build configuration of deviceprogrammer in BOOT.BF.3.0 enables the flag SKIP_SECBOOT_CHECK_NOT_RECOMMENDED_BY_QUALCOMM which will open up the peek and poke commands to any memory location on the target.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThe deviceprogrammer component in Qualcomm Snapdragon chipsets has a default build configuration that enables the SKIP_SECBOOT_CHECK_NOT_RECOMMENDED_BY_QUALCOMM flag, which bypasses secure boot verification and exposes peek and poke commands for unrestricted read/write access to any memory location on the target device.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE dataall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsCVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the Qualcomm chipset modelDetermine the exact chipset variant by checking the device hardware specifications, bootloader strings, or /proc/cpuinfo on the device. Look for identifiers such as mdm9206, mdm9607, mdm9635m, mdm9650, mdm9655, sd210, sd212, or sd205.Affected if The device uses any of the following chipsets: Mdm9206, Mdm9607, Mdm9635m, Mdm9650, Mdm9655, Sd 210, Sd 212, or Sd 205.
-
Check the bootloader or firmware configuration for SKIP_SECBOOT_CHECK flagInspect the bootloader binary or firmware image for the presence of the string 'SKIP_SECBOOT_CHECK_NOT_RECOMMENDED_BY_QUALCOMM' or 'SKIP_SECBOOT_CHECK'. This may require extracting and analyzing the firmware using tools like binwalk, or reading bootloader output over a serial debug interface.Affected if The firmware contains the SKIP_SECBOOT_CHECK flag enabled, indicating secure boot verification is bypassed.
-
Verify secure boot enforcement statusAttempt to boot the device with a modified or unsigned boot image. If the device boots successfully or does not verify the boot chain integrity, secure boot is not enforced. Alternatively, check bootloader debug output for messages indicating secure boot validation passed or failed.Affected if Secure boot validation is bypassed or fails to enforce signature verification on boot images.
-
Test for peek and poke command availabilityAccess the device programmer or diagnostic interface (often available through USB debugging, serial console, or dedicated diagnostic ports). Attempt to execute peek (read memory) or poke (write memory) commands to access arbitrary memory locations outside the intended scope.Affected if Peek and poke commands are accessible and allow unrestricted read/write access to any memory location on the device.
-
Check the Android security patch levelOn Android devices, go to Settings > About Phone > Security Patch Level. Verify if the installed patch level is earlier than 2018-04-05.Affected if The security patch level is before April 5, 2018, and the device uses an affected chipset.
A device is affected if it uses any of the listed Qualcomm chipsets and has the SKIP_SECBOOT_CHECK flag enabled in firmware, resulting in bypassed secure boot and exposed memory access commands.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedApply the Android security patch level 2018-04-05 or later, which disables the insecure SKIP_SECBOOT_CHECK flag and enforces secure boot validation. This requires a firmware update from the device OEM.
Android Security Patch Level 2018-04-05 or later for affected Qualcomm Snapdragon devices (MDM9206, MDM9607, MDM9635M, MDM9650, MDM9655, SD 210, SD 212, SD 205, and other listed variants)
- Update the Android device to security patch level 2018-04-05 or later. This patch addresses the SKIP_SECBOOT_CHECK_NOT_RECOMMENDED_BY_QUALCOMM configuration issue in the deviceprogrammer bootloader component.
- Verify the update was applied by checking Settings > About Phone > Security Patch Level on the device.
- Ensure the device receives subsequent security updates to maintain protection against related vulnerabilities.
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation8.0 h
- Implementation40.0 h
- Testing24.0 h
- Review / QA16.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $24,448.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2018-3591 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2018-3591 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data