CVE-2018-3615
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedSystems with microprocessors utilizing speculative execution and Intel software guard extensions (Intel SGX) may allow unauthorized disclosure of information residing in the L1 data cache from an enclave to an attacker with local user access via a side-channel analysis.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceA speculative execution side-channel vulnerability (L1 Terminal Fault) affecting Intel SGX allows a local attacker to extract sensitive data from SGX enclaves by manipulating cache timing to leak information from the L1 data cache. The attacker must have local user access to the system.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 6006u= 6098p= 6100= 6100e= 6100h= 6100t= 6100te= 6100u= 6102e= 6157u= 6167u= 6300= 650= 655k= 660= 661= 670= 680= 6200u= 6260u= 6267u= 6287u= 6300hq= 6300u= 610e= 620le= 620lm= 620m= 620ue= 620um= 640lm= 640m= 640um= 660lm= 660ue= 660um= 1515m_v5= 1535m_v5= 1545m_v5= 1558l_v5= 1565l_v5= 1575m_v5= 1578l_v5= 1585_v5= 1585l_v5= 1505m_v6= 1535m_v6all versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsCVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify your CPU modelRun 'wmic cpu get name' on Windows or 'cat /proc/cpuinfo' on Linux to get the processor nameAffected if The CPU model matches one of the listed affected variants (e.g., Core i5-6300hq, Xeon E3-1535m_v5)
-
Verify SGX is supported by the CPUOn Windows, run 'wmic cpu get caption' and check for SGX in the feature flags or use Intel's SGX detection tool. On Linux, check /proc/cpuinfo for 'sgx' in flags or run 'cpuid | grep SGX'Affected if SGX is not listed as supported - the vulnerability does not apply to systems without SGX hardware support
-
Check if SGX is enabled in BIOS/UEFIAccess the system BIOS/UEFI settings during boot and look for Intel SGX, Software Guard Extensions, or Processor Security settings. Check if it is set to Enabled or Software ControlAffected if SGX is disabled in BIOS - the attack surface is not present when SGX is disabled at the firmware level
-
Check SGX status at the OS levelOn Windows, run 'systeminfo' and look for SGX details, or check Event Viewer for SGX-related events. On Linux, check 'ls -la /dev/sgx*' or run 'intel-sgx-sysinfo' if installedAffected if SGX is disabled or not available at the OS level - no enclaves can be created or used
-
Detect if SGX enclaves are deployed or runningOn Windows, check for SGX-related software installations or look for processes using SGX. On Linux, check for applications that utilize SGX or look for /opt/intel/sgx* directoriesAffected if No SGX enclaves are deployed - there is no sensitive data in SGX-protected memory to extract
You are affected if your CPU model matches the affected list AND SGX is enabled and actively running enclaves that contain sensitive data.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataApply Intel microcode updates and SGX Platform Software (PSW) updates provided by Intel. Ensure SGX is properly configured and consider disabling SGX enclaves if updates are unavailable.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $6,176.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2018-3615 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sources- software.intel.com
- www.intel.com
- support.lenovo.com
- www.huawei.com
- www.securityfocus.com
- www.securitytracker.com
- psirt.global.sonicwall.com
- security.netapp.com
- support.f5.com
- support.hpe.com
- tools.cisco.com
- www.kb.cert.org
- www.synology.com
- foreshadowattack.eu
- cert-portal.siemens.com
- cert-portal.siemens.com
- lists.debian.org
- nvd.nist.gov
Practitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2018-3615 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data