CVE-2018-3781
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA missing sanitization of search results for an autocomplete field in NextCloud Talk <3.2.5 could lead to a stored XSS requiring user-interaction. The missing sanitization only affected user names, hence malicious search results could only be crafted by authenticated users.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceA stored XSS vulnerability in NextCloud Talk versions before 3.2.5 exists due to missing sanitization of user names in the autocomplete search results. Authenticated users can craft malicious usernames containing JavaScript code that executes in other users' browsers when they interact with the autocomplete field, requiring user-interaction to trigger.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 3.2.5CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Verify NextCloud Talk is installedCheck the apps list in NextCloud admin panel or query the occ command: 'occ app:list' to see if 'spreed' or 'talk' app is enabledAffected if NextCloud Talk app is not installed or not applicable if not using Talk
-
Determine NextCloud Talk versionRun 'occ app:list' or check the Talk app details in the admin panel under Apps > Productivity > Talk to find the installed version numberAffected if Unable to determine the installed version
-
Compare version against affected rangeCompare your installed NextCloud Talk version to 3.2.5 - any version lower than 3.2.5 is affectedAffected if Installed version is less than 3.2.5 (e.g., 3.2.4, 3.2.0, 3.1.x, etc.)
-
Confirm autocomplete feature is accessibleTest that the Talk autocomplete search is functional - type a character in the To: field or participant search in a chat conversation to trigger autocompleteAffected if Autocomplete feature is accessible to authenticated users (standard Talk functionality)
You are affected if NextCloud Talk is installed with a version lower than 3.2.5 and users can access the autocomplete search feature in conversations.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor data3.2.5
Upgrade NextCloud Talk to version 3.2.5 or later which includes proper sanitization of autocomplete search results.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation2.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,984.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2018-3781 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2018-3781 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data