Elastic Cloud EnterpriseApplication · Elastic

CVE-2018-3825

MEDIUM · 5.9 CVSS v3.0 Published 2018-09-19
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to 1.1.4 or later.
See remediation →
68/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
In Elastic Cloud Enterprise (ECE) versions prior to 1.1.4 a default master encryption key is used in the process of granting ZooKeeper access to Elasticsearch clusters. Unless explicitly overwritten, this master key is predictable across all ECE deployments. If an attacker can connect to ZooKeeper directly they would be able to access configuration information of other tenants if their cluster ID is known.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

Elastic Cloud Enterprise uses a default master encryption key for ZooKeeper access to Elasticsearch clusters that is predictable across all ECE deployments. An attacker with direct ZooKeeper access and knowledge of a cluster ID can access configuration information of other tenants.

MitigationUpgrade to ECE 1.1.4 or later, and ensure the default master encryption key is replaced with a unique, strong key in all deployments.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Elastic Cloud EnterpriseApplication
Affected:< 1.1.4

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
High
Privileges
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
None
Availability
None

CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Check ECE version
    Locate and inspect the installed Elastic Cloud Enterprise version. This is typically available via the ECE admin console, installation logs, or by querying the ECE management API endpoint that reports the platform version.
    Affected if The installed version is any release prior to 1.1.4 (versions 1.0.x through 1.1.3 are affected)
  2. Identify the master encryption key configuration
    Locate the configuration file or environment setting that defines the master encryption key used for ZooKeeper access. In ECE this is typically set in the deployment configuration or container environment variables. Inspect whether a custom unique key is configured or if a default/predictable value is present.
    Affected if The default master encryption key remains in use, or the key value appears to be a well-known default rather than a unique strong key generated for this deployment
  3. Verify ZooKeeper access controls
    Examine the ZooKeeper service configuration to determine if direct external access to ZooKeeper is permitted. Check network ACLs, firewall rules, and ZooKeeper listener configuration to see if ZooKeeper ports are exposed beyond the ECE management plane.
    Affected if ZooKeeper accepts direct connections from untrusted networks or non-administrative interfaces, allowing an attacker to reach ZooKeeper directly
  4. Confirm cluster ID exposure
    Determine whether cluster IDs are visible or discoverable to non-administrative users. Check if tenant cluster IDs can be obtained through API responses, logs, or documentation accessible to non-admin users.
    Affected if Cluster IDs for other tenants can be obtained by an attacker with direct ZooKeeper access, enabling them to target specific tenant configurations

A user is affected if running any ECE version prior to 1.1.4 AND the default master encryption key is still configured AND direct ZooKeeper access is available to an attacker who could obtain a cluster ID.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Upgrade available Upgrade to 1.1.4 or later
Fixed in 1.1.4
Interim mitigation

Upgrade to ECE 1.1.4 or later, and ensure the default master encryption key is replaced with a unique, strong key in all deployments.

Fix this in Elastic Cloud Enterprise Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation3.0 h
  • Implementation4.0 h
  • Testing3.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
12.0 hours of engineering $2,130
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,408.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2018-3825 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2018-3825 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data