CVE-2018-5113
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedThe "browser.identity.launchWebAuthFlow" function of WebExtensions is only allowed to load content over "https:" but this requirement was not properly enforced. This can potentially allow privileged pages to be loaded by the extension. This vulnerability affects Firefox < 58.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThe browser.identity.launchWebAuthFlow WebExtension API, used for OAuth authentication flows, was designed to restrict URLs to HTTPS protocol only, but this requirement was improperly enforced. This allowed potentially unprivileged or malicious pages to be loaded within the extension's privileged context, bypassing the intended security boundary.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data<= 57.0.4= 14.04= 16.04= 17.10CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check installed Firefox versionRun 'firefox --version' or go to Firefox > Help > About to see the version numberAffected if Version is 57.0.4 or earlier (the fixed version is 58.0 or later)
-
Identify WebExtensions using identity APICheck installed extensions for use of 'browser.identity.launchWebAuthFlow' in their manifest.json or JavaScript files. Look in the ~/.mozilla/firefox/*/extensions/ directory or the browser's add-on manager.Affected if Any WebExtension is present that uses the launchWebAuthFlow API for OAuth flows
-
Inspect OAuth redirect URI configurationFor extensions using launchWebAuthFlow, examine their source code and OAuth configuration to identify the redirect_uri being used. This is typically found in the manifest.json permissions or the extension's JavaScript calling the API.Affected if The redirect_uri specified in the OAuth flow is HTTP (non-secure) rather than HTTPS, which the vulnerable code allowed
-
Verify Ubuntu system Firefox package versionOn Ubuntu systems, run 'dpkg -l firefox' or 'apt-cache policy firefox' to check the installed Firefox package versionAffected if Running Firefox 57.0.4 or earlier from Ubuntu packages on Ubuntu 14.04, 16.04, or 17.10
A user is affected if they are running Firefox version 57.0.4 or earlier AND have a WebExtension using the identity.launchWebAuthFlow API with an HTTP-based redirect URI, as the improper HTTPS enforcement allowed such non-secure flows to execute in a privileged context.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataUpgrade Firefox to version 58 or later, which contains the proper HTTPS enforcement fix for the launchWebAuthFlow API.
- Consultation1.0 h
- Implementation0.5 h
- Testing1.0 h
- Review / QA0.5 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,200.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2018-5113 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2018-5113 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data