Veraport G3Application · Wizvera

CVE-2018-5199

HIGH · 8.8 CVSS v3.1 Published 2018-12-20
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
95/100
Remediation priority · Urgent
Remotely reachable No privileges

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
In Veraport G3 ALL on MacOS, due to insufficient domain validation, It is possible to overwrite installation file to malicious file. A remote unauthenticated attacker may use this vulnerability to execute arbitrary file.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

VeraPort G3 ALL on MacOS contains an insufficient domain validation vulnerability that allows a remote unauthenticated attacker to overwrite installation files with malicious files during the download process. This enables arbitrary file execution on the affected system.

MitigationApply vendor-provided patches for VeraPort G3. If no patch is available, implement network-level controls such as TLS-inspecting proxies, DNS filtering, or network segmentation to prevent man-in-the-middle attacks against the software update mechanism.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Veraport G3Application
Affected:all versions

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
Required
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Locate VeraPort G3 installation on the system
    Search for the VeraPort G3 application in common MacOS installation directories such as /Applications and ~/Applications, or check for the application bundle named 'VeraPort G3' or similar naming conventions
    Affected if VeraPort G3 application is present on the system
  2. Identify the installed version of VeraPort G3
    Right-click the VeraPort G3 application and select 'Get Info', or use the command 'mdls' or system_profiler to retrieve the application version. Compare the version against the affected range (all versions are affected)
    Affected if Any version of VeraPort G3 is installed, since all versions are vulnerable
  3. Determine if automatic download or update features are enabled
    Examine the VeraPort G3 preferences or configuration settings for options related to automatic updates, automatic downloads, or silent installation features
    Affected if Automatic download or update functionality is enabled, allowing the vulnerable download process to occur
  4. Inspect configuration files for domain validation settings
    Locate and examine VeraPort G3 configuration files (typically stored in Application Support or preferences directories) for settings controlling which domains are trusted for downloads and updates
    Affected if Domain validation is configured to accept any source or lacks strict domain verification
  5. Check for running processes related to VeraPort G3
    Use Activity Monitor or the 'ps' command to check if VeraPort G3 or related update services are actively running on the system
    Affected if VeraPort G3 processes are running and the vulnerable update mechanism is active

If VeraPort G3 is installed and its automatic download or update feature is enabled, the system is affected by this insufficient domain validation vulnerability that allows man-in-the-middle attackers to inject malicious files during the update process.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Apply vendor-provided patches for VeraPort G3. If no patch is available, implement network-level controls such as TLS-inspecting proxies, DNS filtering, or network segmentation to prevent man-in-the-middle attacks against the software update mechanism.

Fix this in Veraport G3 Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation4.0 h
  • Implementation8.0 h
  • Testing4.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
18.0 hours of engineering $3,200
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,120.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2018-5199 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2018-5199 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data