Advanced Secure GatewayApplication · Broadcom

CVE-2018-5241

CRITICAL · 9.8 CVSS v3.0 Published 2018-05-29
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
100/100
Remediation priority · Urgent
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Symantec Advanced Secure Gateway (ASG) 6.6 and 6.7, and ProxySG 6.5, 6.6, and 6.7 are susceptible to a SAML authentication bypass vulnerability. The products can be configured with a SAML authentication realm to authenticate network users in intercepted proxy traffic. When parsing SAML responses, ASG and ProxySG incorrectly handle XML nodes with comments. A remote attacker can modify a valid SAML response without invalidating its cryptographic signature. This may allow the attacker to bypass user authentication security controls in ASG and ProxySG. This vulnerability only affects authentication of network users in intercepted traffic. It does not affect administrator user authentication for the ASG and ProxySG management consoles.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

The vulnerability exists in SAML response parsing on ASG and ProxySG products where XML comment nodes are incorrectly handled during signature verification. An attacker can inject or modify XML comments within a signed SAML response without invalidating the cryptographic signature, allowing authentication bypass for network users accessing intercepted proxy traffic.

MitigationApply vendor patches for ASG 6.6/6.7 and ProxySG 6.5/6.6/6.7. If patches are unavailable, consider compensating controls such as restricting SAML IdP trust to specific entities or implementing additional authentication layers for sensitive access.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Advanced Secure GatewayApplication
Affected:= 6.6= 6.7
Symantec ProxysgApplication
Affected:= 6.5= 6.6= 6.7

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify the installed product
    Determine if the device is running Broadcom Advanced Secure Gateway (ASG) or Broadcom Symantec ProxySG. This is typically visible in the product UI, administrative console, or system information page.
    Affected if The product is ASG version 6.6 or 6.7, or ProxySG version 6.5, 6.6, or 6.7
  2. Check the product version
    Locate the installed software version in the product administrative interface or via CLI command such as 'show version' or 'version' depending on the platform. Compare this version number against the affected ranges: ASG 6.6, 6.7 and ProxySG 6.5, 6.6, 6.7.
    Affected if The installed version exactly matches 6.6 or 6.7 for ASG, or 6.5, 6.6, or 6.7 for ProxySG
  3. Verify SAML authentication is configured
    Check whether SAML (Security Assertion Markup Language) single sign-on is enabled on the device. This is typically found in the proxy configuration, authentication settings, or SSO policy sections of the ASG or ProxySG administrative console.
    Affected if SAML authentication is actively configured and in use for proxy authentication

You are affected if your device runs an affected ASG or ProxySG version AND SAML authentication is enabled, as the vulnerability lies in SAML response signature verification.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Apply vendor patches for ASG 6.6/6.7 and ProxySG 6.5/6.6/6.7. If patches are unavailable, consider compensating controls such as restricting SAML IdP trust to specific entities or implementing additional authentication layers for sensitive access.

Fix this in Advanced Secure Gateway Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation4.0 h
  • Implementation6.0 h
  • Testing8.0 h
  • Review / QA4.0 h
22.0 hours of engineering $3,800
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $6,080.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2018-5241 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2018-5241 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data