CVE-2018-5393
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedThe TP-LINK EAP Controller is TP-LINK's software for remotely controlling wireless access point devices. It utilizes a Java remote method invocation (RMI) service for remote control. The RMI interface does not require any authentication before use, so it lacks user authentication for RMI service commands in EAP controller versions 2.5.3 and earlier. Remote attackers can implement deserialization attacks through the RMI protocol. Successful attacks may allow a remote attacker to remotely control the target server and execute Java functions or bytecode.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceTP-LINK EAP Controller versions 2.5.3 and earlier expose an unauthenticated Java RMI (Remote Method Invocation) service. The RMI interface lacks any authentication requirements, allowing remote attackers to send malicious serialized Java objects. Attackers can exploit unsafe deserialization to execute arbitrary Java code or bytecode remotely, achieving full compromise of the target server.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data<= 2.5.3CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify if TP-LINK EAP Controller is installedLocate the EAP Controller installation directory. On Windows, check C:\Program Files\TP-LINK\EAP Controller or C:\Program Files (x86)\TP-LINK\EAP Controller. On Linux, check /opt/tplink/EAPController or /usr/local/EAPController. Look for the 'EAP_Controller' or 'eapnms' directory and verify the presence of jar files and configuration files.Affected if The EAP Controller software is present on the system.
-
Determine the installed EAP Controller versionLocate the version file or check the application properties. Common paths include: <install_dir>/lib/com.tp-link.eap.properties, <install_dir>/version.ini, or the control panel Programs and Features entry. The version may also be displayed in the web management interface login page or in startup logs.Affected if The installed version is 2.5.3 or any earlier version.
-
Verify the RMI service is exposed and listeningCheck for open ports associated with Java RMI services. Use 'netstat -an' or 'ss -tulpn' to list listening ports. RMI commonly uses ports 1098-1099, 8080, or 8443. Look for these ports in the LISTEN state and verify they are bound to an interface accessible from the network (0.0.0.0 or external IP rather than 127.0.0.1).Affected if Port 1098, 1099, 8080, 8443 or similar Java RMI ports are listening and accessible from the network.
-
Confirm RMI service lacks authenticationAttempt to connect to the exposed RMI port using an RMI client or tools like 'rmiregistry' or a Java client that can invoke remote objects. If the service accepts connections without any authentication challenge, this confirms the vulnerability. In logs, look for RMI service initialization without security manager or authentication modules loaded.Affected if The RMI service accepts connections without requiring authentication credentials.
A system is affected if TP-LINK EAP Controller version 2.5.3 or earlier is installed and the Java RMI service is exposed to the network without authentication enforcement.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedAdd authentication enforcement to the RMI service interface and implement safe deserialization whitelisting/validation. If available, upgrade to a patched version of EAP Controller that addresses this vulnerability.
Upgrade to a version newer than 2.5.3 (check TP-LINK support for the specific fixed release)
- 1. Identify all TP-LINK EAP Controller instances running version 2.5.3 or earlier in your environment.
- 2. Consult the official TP-LINK support website or release notes to identify the latest stable version of EAP Controller that addresses CVE-2018-5393.
- 3. Before upgrading, perform a full backup of the current EAP Controller configuration and database.
- 4. Schedule a maintenance window to minimize operational impact.
- 5. Download the updated EAP Controller software from the official TP-LINK website.
- 6. Follow the vendor's official upgrade procedure documented in the EAP Controller administration guide.
- 7. After upgrade, verify the RMI service is now properly secured with authentication.
- 8. Confirm the new version is running: 2.5.3
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation16.0 h
- Testing8.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $8,960.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2018-5393 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2018-5393 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data