CVE-2018-5521
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedOn F5 BIG-IP 12.1.0-12.1.3.1, 11.6.1-11.6.3.1, 11.5.1-11.5.5, or 11.2.1, carefully crafted URLs can be used to reflect arbitrary content into GeoIP lookup responses, potentially exposing clients to XSS.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThe F5 BIG-IP GeoIP lookup feature does not properly sanitize user-supplied input in URLs, allowing arbitrary content to be reflected into the response. This reflected XSS vulnerability could allow attackers to execute malicious JavaScript in the context of victims' browsers when they interact with crafted URLs.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 11.5.1, <= 11.5.5>= 11.6.1, <= 11.6.3>= 12.1.0, <= 12.1.3= 11.2.1>= 11.5.1, <= 11.5.5>= 11.6.1, <= 11.6.3>= 12.1.0, <= 12.1.3= 11.2.1>= 11.5.1, <= 11.5.5>= 11.6.1, <= 11.6.3>= 12.1.0, <= 12.1.3= 11.2.1>= 11.5.1, <= 11.5.5>= 11.6.1, <= 11.6.3>= 12.1.0, <= 12.1.3= 11.2.1>= 11.5.1, <= 11.5.5>= 11.6.1, <= 11.6.3>= 12.1.0, <= 12.1.3= 11.2.1>= 11.5.1, <= 11.5.5>= 11.6.1, <= 11.6.3>= 12.1.0, <= 12.1.3= 11.2.1>= 11.5.1, <= 11.5.5>= 11.6.1, <= 11.6.3>= 12.1.0, <= 12.1.3= 11.2.1>= 11.5.1, <= 11.5.5>= 11.6.1, <= 11.6.3>= 12.1.0, <= 12.1.3= 11.2.1CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the installed BIG-IP versionRun 'tmsh show /sys version' on the command line, or check the version displayed in the web UI footer, or inspect /etc/product_versionAffected if The version falls within 11.2.1, 11.5.1-11.5.5, 11.6.1-11.6.3, or 12.1.0-12.1.3
-
Locate active GeoIP profilesIn the web UI, navigate to Local Traffic > Profiles > GeoIP, or run 'tmsh list ltm profile geo-ip' via command line to list all GeoIP profiles configured on the systemAffected if Any GeoIP profile exists and is assigned to a virtual server
-
Identify iRules using GeoIP lookup commandsRun 'tmsh list ltm rule all' and search for 'geo' or 'GEO' commands such as 'class match', 'findclass', or '-geo' pool selection that reference the GeoIP databaseAffected if Any iRule contains GeoIP lookup commands and is applied to a virtual server
-
Check for GeoIP database file presenceInspect the directory /shared/lib/GeoIP.dat or /var/GeoIP/ for the presence of a MaxMind GeoIP database fileAffected if A GeoIP database file is present and the system is using the GeoIP feature
A system is affected if it runs a vulnerable BIG-IP version AND has the GeoIP lookup feature enabled (via profiles, iRules, or other configurations) that could reflect URL parameters into responses.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataUpdate to a patched F5 BIG-IP version as specified in F5 advisory, or temporarily disable the GeoIP lookup feature if updating is not immediately feasible.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation2.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,984.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2018-5521 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2018-5521 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data