CVE-2018-5532
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedOn F5 BIG-IP 13.0.0, 12.1.0-12.1.2, 11.6.0-11.6.3.1, or 11.2.1-11.5.6 a domain name cached within the DNS Cache of TMM may continue to be resolved by the cache even after the parent server revokes the record, if the DNS Cache is receiving a stream of requests for the cached name.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceF5 BIG-IP TMM DNS cache continues serving stale domain name resolutions even after the authoritative server revokes the record, when the DNS cache receives a continuous stream of requests for that cached name. This allows attackers to potentially reach IP addresses that should no longer be valid.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 11.2.1, <= 11.5.6>= 11.6.0, <= 11.6.3.1>= 12.1.0, <= 12.1.2= 13.0.0>= 11.2.1, <= 11.5.6>= 11.6.0, <= 11.6.3.1>= 12.1.0, <= 12.1.2= 13.0.0>= 11.2.1, <= 11.5.6>= 11.6.0, <= 11.6.3.1>= 12.1.0, <= 12.1.2= 13.0.0>= 11.2.1, <= 11.5.6>= 11.6.0, <= 11.6.3.1>= 12.1.0, <= 12.1.2= 13.0.0>= 11.2.1, <= 11.5.6>= 11.6.0, <= 11.6.3.1>= 12.1.0, <= 12.1.2= 13.0.0>= 10.1.0, <= 11.5.6>= 11.6.0, <= 11.6.3.1>= 12.1.0, <= 12.1.2= 13.0.0>= 11.2.1, <= 11.5.6>= 11.6.0, <= 11.6.3.1>= 12.1.0, <= 12.1.2= 13.0.0>= 11.2.1, <= 11.5.6>= 11.6.0, <= 11.6.3.1>= 12.1.0, <= 12.1.2= 13.0.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify F5 BIG-IP product versionRun 'tmsh show /sys version' or check /etc/product_version to obtain the installed versionAffected if The version falls within >= 11.2.1 <= 11.5.6, >= 11.6.0 <= 11.6.3.1, >= 12.1.0 <= 12.1.2, or = 13.0.0
-
Confirm DNS cache module is activeRun 'tmsh show /ltm dns' or 'tmsh list /ltm dns cache' to check if DNS caching is enabled on the TMMAffected if DNS cache is enabled and serving responses
-
Check DNS cache statistics for stale responsesRun 'tmsh show /ltm dns cache statistics' and review cache age/ttl values compared to configured cache settingsAffected if Cached entries are being served beyond their intended TTL under high request load
-
Identify which BIG-IP module uses DNS cachingReview installed modules via 'tmsh show /sys module' and check which modules (LTM, AAM, AFM, DNS, ASM, APM, Analytics, Edge Gateway) have DNS proxy/cache enabledAffected if Any of the affected modules (LTM, AAM, AFM, Analytics, APM, ASM, DNS, Edge Gateway) are running with DNS cache enabled
You are affected if you run any of the listed BIG-IP modules on a version within the affected ranges AND have DNS cache enabled in your configuration.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataApply the appropriate F5 hotfix or upgrade to a fixed version as specified in the F5 security advisory.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation2.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,392.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2018-5532 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2018-5532 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data