PhantompdfApplication · Foxitsoftware

CVE-2018-5676

HIGH · 8.8 CVSS v3.0 Published 2018-05-24
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to after 9.0.1.1049 or later.
See remediation →
95/100
Remediation priority · Urgent
Remotely reachable No privileges

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on vulnerable installations of Foxit Reader before 9.1 and PhantomPDF before 9.1. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the processing of specially crafted pdf files with embedded u3d images. Crafted data in the PDF file can trigger an overflow of a heap-based buffer. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code under the context of the current process, a different vulnerability than CVE-2018-5674 and CVE-2018-5678.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

Heap-based buffer overflow vulnerability in Foxit Reader and PhantomPDF when processing specially crafted PDF files containing embedded U3D (Universal 3D) images. The overflow occurs during parsing of the U3D data, allowing remote attackers to execute arbitrary code under the context of the current user process.

MitigationUpgrade to Foxit Reader 9.1 or PhantomPDF 9.1 or later. Until patched, avoid opening PDF files from untrusted sources or disable JavaScript execution in the application settings.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
PhantompdfApplication
Affected:<= 9.0.1.1049
ReaderApplication
Affected:<= 9.0.1.1049

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
Required
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify installed Foxit product
    Check for Foxit Reader or PhantomPDF installation via Start Menu, Program Files directory, or Windows Registry at HKLM\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Uninstall or HKLM\SOFTWARE\WOW6432Node\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Uninstall
    Affected if Either Foxit Reader or PhantomPDF is installed
  2. Determine installed version number
    Open the application, go to Help > About, or check the version in the application's entry in Windows Registry under 'DisplayVersion' value
    Affected if Version is <= 9.0.1.1049
  3. Confirm U3D support is available
    Verify the Foxit installation includes U3D parsing capability by checking for U3D-related DLLs (u3d.dll or similar) in the installation directory, or attempt to open a PDF containing a U3D object to confirm processing is possible
    Affected if U3D image processing is supported and enabled in the application
  4. Check if JavaScript execution is enabled
    In Foxit Reader/PhantomPDF, go to Edit > Preferences > JavaScript and verify if JavaScript execution is enabled
    Affected if JavaScript is enabled (this is a contributing factor for exploitation via malicious PDF files)
  5. Verify vulnerability applicability
    Confirm that the installed Foxit version is <= 9.0.1.1049 AND the application can process embedded U3D content in PDF files
    Affected if Both conditions are true: version is in the affected range AND U3D processing is possible in the environment

You are affected if Foxit Reader or PhantomPDF version 9.0.1.1049 or lower is installed and the application can parse U3D objects embedded in PDF files.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Upgrade available Upgrade to a release after 9.0.1.1049
Interim mitigation

Upgrade to Foxit Reader 9.1 or PhantomPDF 9.1 or later. Until patched, avoid opening PDF files from untrusted sources or disable JavaScript execution in the application settings.

Fix this in Phantompdf Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation2.0 h
  • Implementation4.0 h
  • Testing2.0 h
  • Review / QA1.0 h
9.0 hours of engineering $1,600
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,560.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2018-5676 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2018-5676 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data