CVE-2018-6320
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA vulnerability has been discovered in login.cgi in Pulse Secure Pulse Connect Secure (PCS) 8.1RX before 8.1R12 and 8.3RX before 8.3R2 and Pulse Policy Secure (PPS) 5.2RX before 5.2R9 and 5.4RX before 5.4R2 wherein an http(s) Host header received from the browser is trusted without validation.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceA Host Header Injection vulnerability exists in login.cgi of Pulse Secure Pulse Connect Secure and Pulse Policy Secure appliances where the HTTP Host header from incoming requests is blindly trusted without validation, potentially allowing attackers to manipulate the Host value for cache poisoning, password reset poisoning, or XSS attacks.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 8.1= 8.1r1.0= 8.1rx= 8.3rx= 5.2r1.0= 5.2r2.0= 5.2r3.0= 5.2r3.2= 5.2r4.0= 5.2r5.0= 5.2r6.0= 5.2r7.0= 5.2r7.1= 5.2r8.0= 5.2rx= 5.4r1CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify installed product and versionAccess the admin console or use system information commands (e.g., 'get system' or 'show version') to determine if the device is running Pulse Connect Secure or Pulse Policy Secure and note the exact version numberAffected if The version matches 8.1r1.0, 8.1rx, 8.3rx (PCS) or any version from 5.2r1.0 through 5.4r1 (PPS), or is exactly 8.1 (Ivanti Connect Secure)
-
Confirm login.cgi endpoint existsVerify that the login.cgi script is present and accessible on the appliance by checking the web root directory or attempting to access the login page via HTTP/HTTPSAffected if login.cgi is present and accessible, indicating the vulnerable component is enabled
-
Check for Host header validationSend a test HTTP request to login.cgi with a manipulated Host header (e.g., Host: attacker.com) and observe whether the response reflects the injected value or processes it without validationAffected if The Host header value is accepted and reflected in the response without sanitization or rejection, indicating the vulnerability is present
The environment is affected if the installed version matches any of the listed affected version ranges AND the login.cgi endpoint is accessible without Host header validation in place.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedUpgrade to the fixed versions (PCS 8.1R12/8.3R2 or PPS 5.2R9/5.4R2) or implement strict validation of the HTTP Host header in login.cgi to only allow whitelisted values.
8.1R12 (for PCS 8.1RX), 8.3R2 (for PCS 8.3RX), 5.2R9 (for PPS 5.2RX), 5.4R2 (for PPS 5.4RX)
- 1. Identify the exact product version running (Pulse Connect Secure or Pulse Policy Secure)
- 2. For Pulse Connect Secure 8.1RX: Upgrade to version 8.1R12 or later
- 3. For Pulse Connect Secure 8.3RX: Upgrade to version 8.3R2 or later
- 4. For Pulse Policy Secure 5.2RX: Upgrade to version 5.2R9 or later
- 5. For Pulse Policy Secure 5.4RX: Upgrade to version 5.4R2 or later
- 6. Download the patch from kb.pulsesecure.net and follow the standard upgrade procedure
- 7. After upgrade, verify the login.cgi properly validates HTTP Host headers
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,088.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2018-6320 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2018-6320 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data