ReactFramework / library · Facebook

CVE-2018-6341

MEDIUM · 6.1 CVSS v3.1 Published 2018-12-31
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to 16.0.1 / 16.1.2 or later.
See remediation →
68/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
Remotely reachable No privileges

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
React applications which rendered to HTML using the ReactDOMServer API were not escaping user-supplied attribute names at render-time. That lack of escaping could lead to a cross-site scripting vulnerability. This issue affected minor releases 16.0.x, 16.1.x, 16.2.x, 16.3.x, and 16.4.x. It was fixed in 16.0.1, 16.1.2, 16.2.1, 16.3.3, and 16.4.2.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

React applications using ReactDOMServer API to render HTML failed to escape user-supplied attribute names at render-time, allowing injection of malicious attribute names that could execute arbitrary JavaScript via cross-site scripting (XSS).

MitigationUpdate React to patched versions (16.0.1, 16.1.2, 16.2.1, 16.3.3, or 16.4.2 or later) and audit any code that passes user input as attribute names to server-side rendering methods.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
ReactFramework / library
Affected:>= 16.0.0, < 16.0.1>= 16.1.0, < 16.1.2>= 16.2.0, < 16.2.1>= 16.3.0, < 16.3.3>= 16.4.0, < 16.4.2

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
Required
Scope
Changed
Confidentiality
Low
Integrity
Low
Availability
None

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify installed React version
    Run `npm list react` or check package.json for the react package version number
    Affected if The version falls within any of these ranges: >= 16.0.0 and < 16.0.1, or >= 16.1.0 and < 16.1.2, or >= 16.2.0 and < 16.2.1, or >= 16.3.0 and < 16.3.3, or >= 16.4.0 and < 16.4.2
  2. Locate ReactDOMServer usage in codebase
    Search source code files for imports or requires of 'react-dom/server' or references to methods such as renderToString, renderToStaticMarkup, renderToNodeStream, or renderToStaticNodeStream
    Affected if The application imports or uses ReactDOMServer API for server-side rendering
  3. Inspect attribute handling in server-rendered components
    Review code paths that pass data to server rendering methods (renderToString, renderToStaticMarkup, etc.) and identify any instance where user-supplied input or dynamic data is used as an attribute name in JSX elements
    Affected if User-controlled data flows into the attribute name position of JSX elements that are rendered via ReactDOMServer methods
  4. Verify exposure of server-rendered output
    Confirm that the output from ReactDOMServer rendering methods is served to end users (e.g., via HTTP responses, API endpoints, or hydrated on the client)
    Affected if The server-rendered HTML is returned to browsers without additional server-side escaping of attribute names

You are affected if your React version is in the vulnerable ranges AND your application uses ReactDOMServer to render HTML from user input as attribute names that are served to clients.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Upgrade available Upgrade to 16.0.1 / 16.1.2 / 16.2.1 or later
Fixed in 16.0.116.1.216.2.1
Interim mitigation

Update React to patched versions (16.0.1, 16.1.2, 16.2.1, 16.3.3, or 16.4.2 or later) and audit any code that passes user input as attribute names to server-side rendering methods.

Fix this in React Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation1.0 h
  • Implementation2.0 h
  • Testing2.0 h
  • Review / QA1.0 h
6.0 hours of engineering $1,040
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,664.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2018-6341 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2018-6341 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data