CVE-2018-6918
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedIn FreeBSD before 11.1-STABLE, 11.1-RELEASE-p9, 10.4-STABLE, 10.4-RELEASE-p8 and 10.3-RELEASE-p28, the length field of the ipsec option header does not count the size of the option header itself, causing an infinite loop when the length is zero. This issue can allow a remote attacker who is able to send an arbitrary packet to cause the machine to crash.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceIn FreeBSD's IPsec implementation, the length field of the ipsec option header does not account for the option header's own size. When a crafted packet with length set to zero is received, this calculation error causes an infinite loop in the kernel, resulting in a denial of service (system crash).
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 10.0, < 10.4>= 11.0, < 11.1CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify FreeBSD versionRun 'uname -a' or 'freebsd-version -u' to display the installed FreeBSD versionAffected if The version is 10.0 through 10.3.x, or 11.0 through 11.0.x (falls within >=10.0,<10.4 or >=11.0,<11.1)
-
Verify IPsec kernel module is loadedRun 'kldstat | grep ipsec' to check if the IPsec kernel module is loadedAffected if The ipsec module appears in the output, indicating IPsec is available on the system
-
Check for active IPsec SAsRun 'setkey -DP' to display active IPsec security associationsAffected if Any IPsec SAs (Security Associations) are listed, meaning IPsec is actively in use
-
Verify IPsec configuration existsCheck for /etc/ipsec.conf or run 'ipsec status' if configuredAffected if An IPsec configuration file exists or IPsec status shows active tunnels
-
Monitor for IPsec trafficUse 'tcpdump -i <interface> -c 10 esp' to capture ESP (IPsec) packets on network interfacesAffected if ESP (Encapsulating Security Payload) traffic is observed, indicating the system is processing IPsec packets
A system is affected if it runs a vulnerable FreeBSD version (10.0-10.3.x or 11.0-11.0.x) AND has IPsec enabled or configured to process IPsec traffic.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor data10.411.1
Apply the FreeBSD security patches (11.1-RELEASE-p9, 10.4-RELEASE-p8, 10.3-RELEASE-p28 or later) or upgrade to a patched stable release to remediate this vulnerability.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,560.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2018-6918 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2018-6918 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data