CVE-2018-7119
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA Local Disclosure of Sensitive Information vulnerability was identified in HPE NonStop Safeguard earlier than version SPR T9750L01^AIC or T9750H05^AIH, and later versions when the PASSWORD-PROMPT configuration attribute is not set to BLIND; all versions on H-series. STDSEC-STANDARD SECURITY PROD All prior versions before T6533L01^ADU or T6533H05^ADW, and later versions when the PASSWORD-PROMPT configuration attribute is not set to BLIND and all versions on H-series . Note that some commands in NonStop Safeguard and NonStop Standard Security software require username and password to be passed as command line parameters, which may lead to a local disclosure of the credentials.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceHPE NonStop Safeguard and NonStop Standard Security allow usernames and passwords to be passed as command-line parameters when the PASSWORD-PROMPT configuration attribute is not set to BLIND. This enables local users to discover credentials through process inspection, command history, or other local observation methods, resulting in sensitive information disclosure.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE dataall versions< t9750h05\^aih< t9750l01\^aicall versions<= t6533h05\^adw< t6533l01\^aduCVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- High
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.0/AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the installed NonStop product and versionUse the system's software inventory or version reporting mechanism to determine if HPE NonStop Safeguard or NonStop Standard Security is installed, and note the exact version string (for example, run the product's version command or check the installed software package)Affected if The product is HPE NonStop Safeguard or NonStop Standard Security with a version that falls within the affected ranges (H Series all versions, J Series < t9750h05/^aih for Safeguard or <= t6533h05/^adw for Standard Security, L Series < t9750l01/^aic for Safeguard or < t6533l01/^adu for Standard Secu
-
Locate the PASSWORD-PROMPT configuration settingAccess the NonStop Safeguard or Standard Security configuration file (typically found in the product's configuration directory) and search for the PASSWORD-PROMPT attributeAffected if The PASSWORD-PROMPT attribute is present but is NOT set to BLIND, or the PASSWORD-PROMPT attribute is absent entirely from the configuration
-
Inspect running processes for exposed credentialsUse system process inspection commands (such as process listing utilities available on NonStop systems) to examine running processes and their command-line arguments, looking for any processes that show username or password strings in the command lineAffected if Any Safeguard or Standard Security processes are observed with username or password parameters visible in the command-line arguments
-
Review command history for credential exposureExamine the system's command history logs or audit trails for recent commands that invoked Safeguard or Standard Security utilities with username and password arguments passed directly on the command lineAffected if Command history shows recent use of commands with credentials passed as visible command-line arguments
A system is affected if it runs HPE NonStop Safeguard or Standard Security in an affected version range AND has PASSWORD-PROMPT configured to something other than BLIND (or not configured at all), allowing credentials to be observable in process listings or command history.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataSet the PASSWORD-PROMPT configuration attribute to BLIND to prevent credential exposure via command-line parameters, and upgrade to version SPR T9750L01^AIC or later (NonStop Safeguard) or T6533L01^ADU or later (NonStop Standard Security).
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,408.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2018-7119 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2018-7119 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data