WplsoftApplication · Deltaww

CVE-2018-7507

HIGH · 8.8 CVSS v3.0 Published 2018-05-04
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to after 2.45.0 or later.
See remediation →
95/100
Remediation priority · Urgent
Remotely reachable No privileges

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
WPLSoft in Delta Electronics versions 2.45.0 and prior utilizes a fixed length heap buffer where a value larger than the buffer can be read from a file into the buffer, causing the buffer to be overwritten, which may allow remote code execution or cause the application to crash.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

WPLSoft (Delta Electronics PLC programming software) versions 2.45.0 and prior contain a heap-based buffer overflow vulnerability. The application uses a fixed-size heap buffer when reading data from files, but fails to validate that the input data size does not exceed the buffer capacity before copying. This allows an attacker to overflow the heap buffer by supplying a specially crafted file containing data larger than the allocated buffer, potentially achieving remote code execution or causing denial of service.

MitigationUpgrade WPLSoft to a version newer than 2.45.0. Until the upgrade is available, exercise caution when opening WPLSoft project files from untrusted sources, as the vulnerability is triggerable through malicious file parsing.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
WplsoftApplication
Affected:<= 2.45.0

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
Required
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Verify WPLSoft installation
    Search for WPLSoft on the system by checking Program Files directories or using system inventory tools. Look for the WPLSoft.exe executable.
    Affected if WPLSoft is present on the system
  2. Determine installed WPLSoft version
    Locate the WPLSoft executable and retrieve its version information. Right-click on the executable, select Properties, then view the Details tab for version number, or use command-line tools to query the file version.
    Affected if Cannot retrieve version information or version is <= 2.45.0
  3. Compare version against affected range
    Compare the installed version number to the affected range. Versions 2.45.0 and prior are within the affected range.
    Affected if Installed version is 2.45.0 or lower (for example, 2.44.0, 2.40.0, etc.)
  4. Assess file processing exposure
    Determine if WPLSoft is used to open project files from external or untrusted sources. The vulnerability is triggerable through malicious file parsing when the application reads specially crafted files.
    Affected if WPLSoft is used to process project files from untrusted or external sources

The environment is affected if WPLSoft version 2.45.0 or lower is installed and the application is used to open project files, since the heap-based buffer overflow can be triggered during file parsing.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Upgrade available Upgrade to a release after 2.45.0
Interim mitigation

Upgrade WPLSoft to a version newer than 2.45.0. Until the upgrade is available, exercise caution when opening WPLSoft project files from untrusted sources, as the vulnerability is triggerable through malicious file parsing.

Fix this in Wplsoft Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation1.0 h
  • Implementation2.0 h
  • Testing2.0 h
  • Review / QA1.0 h
6.0 hours of engineering $1,040
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,664.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2018-7507 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2018-7507 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data