Privileged Access ManagerApplication · Broadcom

CVE-2018-9026

HIGH · 7.5 CVSS v3.0 Published 2018-06-18
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to 3.0.0 or later.
See remediation →
84/100
Remediation priority · High
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
A session fixation vulnerability in CA Privileged Access Manager 2.x allows remote attackers to hijack user sessions with a specially crafted request.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

Session fixation vulnerability in CA Privileged Access Manager 2.x allows remote attackers to hijack authenticated user sessions by using a specially crafted request to set or predict the session identifier before the victim authenticates, then reusing that same session ID after authentication to gain unauthorized access.

MitigationImplement proper session ID regeneration upon successful authentication and invalidate any pre-authentication session identifiers. Additionally, configure the application to use cryptographically random, unpredictable session IDs and enforce session expiration policies.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Privileged Access ManagerApplication
Affected:>= 2.0.0, < 3.0.0

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
None
Integrity
High
Availability
None

CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify the installed product and version
    Check the application version through the management console, about page, or command line utility (such as 'capamversion' or similar administrative tool). Look for version information in the product's web interface under Administration or System Information.
    Affected if The installed version is Broadcom Privileged Access Manager (formerly CA PAM) version 2.0.0 or higher but lower than 3.0.0.
  2. Confirm the product is the vulnerable component
    Verify that the identified product is the Privileged Access Manager server component and not a different CA/Broadcom product. The vulnerability affects the core PAM server handling authentication sessions.
    Affected if The product is the CA/Broadcom Privileged Access Manager server in the affected version range.
  3. Inspect session management configuration
    Access the administrative console and navigate to Session Management or Security Settings. Look for configuration options related to session ID handling, specifically whether session IDs are regenerated after successful authentication.
    Affected if Session ID regeneration after authentication is disabled, not configured, or set to reuse pre-authentication session identifiers.
  4. Review authentication workflow for session handling
    Examine the authentication logs or use a test account to perform a login while monitoring session cookies or session identifiers. Observe whether a new session ID is issued after successful authentication compared to before authentication.
    Affected if The session identifier remains the same or is predictable between the pre-authentication and post-authentication states.

You are affected if Broadcom Privileged Access Manager version 2.0.0 through 2.x is installed and session IDs are not regenerated after authentication, allowing session fixation attacks.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Upgrade available Upgrade to 3.0.0 or later
Fixed in 3.0.0
Interim mitigation

Implement proper session ID regeneration upon successful authentication and invalidate any pre-authentication session identifiers. Additionally, configure the application to use cryptographically random, unpredictable session IDs and enforce session expiration policies.

Fix this in Privileged Access Manager Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation4.0 h
  • Implementation8.0 h
  • Testing6.0 h
  • Review / QA3.0 h
21.0 hours of engineering $3,680
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,888.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2018-9026 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2018-9026 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data