Mivoice ConnectApplication · Mitel

CVE-2018-9102

MEDIUM · 6.5 CVSS v3.0 Published 2018-04-25
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to after 21.84.5535.0 or later.
See remediation →
72/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
Remotely reachable No privileges

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
A vulnerability in the conferencing component of Mitel MiVoice Connect, versions R1707-PREM SP1 (21.84.5535.0) and earlier, and Mitel ST 14.2, versions GA27 (19.49.5200.0) and earlier, could allow an unauthenticated attacker to conduct an SQL injection attack due to insufficient input validation for the signin interface. A successful exploit could allow an attacker to extract sensitive information from the database.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

SQL injection vulnerability in the signin interface of Mitel MiVoice Connect conferencing component. Insufficient input validation allows unauthenticated attackers to inject malicious SQL queries, potentially extracting sensitive data from the database.

MitigationUpgrade to a patched version of MiVoice Connect or ST 14.2 beyond the affected versions. If patching is not immediately possible, implement input validation and parameterized queries on the signin interface to block SQL injection payloads.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Mivoice ConnectApplication
Affected:<= 21.84.5535.0
St 14.2Application
Affected:<= 19.49.5200.0

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
Required
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
None
Availability
None

CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify the installed MiVoice Connect version
    Locate the application version information in the Mitel MiVoice Connect installation, typically found in the product information, about section, or system configuration panel. Compare the installed version number to the affected range of <= 21.84.5535.0
    Affected if The installed version is 21.84.5535.0 or lower
  2. Identify the installed ST 14.2 version
    Locate the application version information in the Mitel ST 14.2 installation, typically found in the product information, about section, or system configuration panel. Compare the installed version number to the affected range of <= 19.49.5200.0
    Affected if The installed version is 19.49.5200.0 or lower
  3. Verify the conferencing component is enabled
    Check if the Mitel conferencing component is installed and active on the system. This may be visible in the Mitel administration console, services list, or component overview
    Affected if The conferencing component is present and running on the affected product version
  4. Confirm signin interface accessibility
    Determine if the signin interface for the conferencing component is exposed to network access, either internally or externally. This interface is where user authentication occurs
    Affected if The signin interface is accessible and the product version falls within the affected ranges

The environment is affected if running MiVoice Connect version 21.84.5535.0 or lower, or ST 14.2 version 19.49.5200.0 or lower, with the conferencing signin interface exposed.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Upgrade available Upgrade to a release after 21.84.5535.0
Interim mitigation

Upgrade to a patched version of MiVoice Connect or ST 14.2 beyond the affected versions. If patching is not immediately possible, implement input validation and parameterized queries on the signin interface to block SQL injection payloads.

Fix this in Mivoice Connect Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation3.0 h
  • Implementation8.0 h
  • Testing4.0 h
  • Review / QA3.0 h
18.0 hours of engineering $3,180
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,088.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2018-9102 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2018-9102 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data