CVE-2018-9348
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedIn SMF_ParseMetaEvent of eas_smf.c, there is a possible integer overflow. This could lead to remote denial of service due to resource exhaustion with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is needed for exploitation.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceAn integer overflow vulnerability exists in the SMF_ParseMetaEvent function when parsing Standard MIDI File (SMF) metadata events. The overflow occurs during size calculation or memory allocation, potentially causing excessive resource consumption. Successful exploitation leads to denial of service via resource exhaustion when a user opens a specially crafted MIDI file.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 6.0= 6.0.1= 7.0= 7.1.1= 7.1.2= 8.0= 8.1CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Verify Android version is affectedCheck the device or build system Android version via 'getprop ro.build.version.release' or Settings > About Phone > Android version. Compare against 6.0, 6.0.1, 7.0, 7.1.1, 7.1.2, 8.0, or 8.1.Affected if The device runs Android 6.0 through 8.1 inclusive.
-
Identify MIDI file parsing capabilityAudit installed applications or system services that handle Standard MIDI Files (.mid, .smf extensions). Look for music apps, MIDI players, DAW apps, or any app that imports MIDI content.Affected if Any application that parses SMF files is installed and active on the device.
-
Confirm SMF parser library presenceSearch for libsmf or MIDI parsing libraries in /system/lib or within application APK files. Use 'find /system -name *smf*' or inspect app native libraries.Affected if The SMF_ParseMetaEvent function or related MIDI parsing library exists in the system or app.
-
Check for exposed attack surfaceReview which apps can receive or open MIDI file attachments (email clients, file managers, music apps, browsers). Determine if any app automatically processes received files.Affected if Users can open untrusted MIDI files through any installed application.
A user is affected if their Android device runs version 6.0 through 8.1 and they have any application that parses Standard MIDI Files, allowing them to open potentially malicious .mid files.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedImplement proper bounds checking and validation of size fields before arithmetic operations in the SMF parser. Ensure that any size calculations are validated against reasonable limits and cannot overflow. Apply any available vendor patches for the affected library.
Android 8.0 (Oreo) or later; ideally the latest available Android version with current security patches
- 1. Check the current Android version on the affected device by navigating to Settings > About Phone > Android version
- 2. If the device is running Android 6.0, 6.0.1, 7.0, or 7.1.1, check if a system update is available via Settings > System > Software Update
- 3. If an official update is available, download and install it to receive the security patch containing the fix for CVE-2018-9348
- 4. If no official update is available from the device manufacturer, consider upgrading to a device that receives active security updates
- 5. As a mitigation, avoid opening untrusted MIDI/SMF files from unknown sources until the device is updated
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,088.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2018-9348 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2018-9348 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data