AndroidOperating system · Google

CVE-2018-9364

HIGH · 7.5 CVSS v3.1 Published 2024-11-19
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
84/100
Remediation priority · High
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
In the LG LAF component, there is a special command that allowed modification of certain partitions. This could lead to bypass of secure boot. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

The vulnerability exists in LG's LAF (LG Android Flash) component, which provides a download mode for flashing devices. A special undocumented command allows modification of specific partitions, which can be leveraged to bypass secure boot verification. This enables an attacker to write to protected partitions (like boot or system) without proper cryptographic signature validation, breaking the boot chain integrity.

MitigationOEM firmware update from LG is required to remove or properly secure this undocumented command in the LAF component. Users should apply manufacturer security updates promptly.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
AndroidOperating system
Affected:all versions

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
None
Integrity
High
Availability
None

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify if the device is an LG device or runs LG firmware
    Check the device manufacturer and model information via 'Settings > About Phone > Manufacturer' or by reviewing the bootloader splash screen on device boot
    Affected if The device is manufactured by LG or contains LG's LAF (LG Android Flash) component in its firmware
  2. Verify presence of LAF download mode
    Attempt to enter LAF mode by powering off the device, then holding Volume Down + Power button (or check device-specific key combination for 'Download Mode' on LG devices)
    Affected if The device boots into a proprietary LG download/firmware flash interface (often labeled 'LG Flash' or 'Download Mode') rather than standard Android recovery or fastboot
  3. Confirm undocumented LAF command availability
    While in LAF mode, attempt to issue undocumented partition modification commands through USB debugging or LAF flashing utility (this requires specific LG tooling)
    Affected if The LAF interface accepts commands to modify protected partitions (boot, system) without returning signature validation errors
  4. Check if secure boot verification is bypassed
    After attempting partition modifications via LAF, verify the device still boots and check if custom unsigned images were successfully written to protected partitions
    Affected if Unsigned or custom partitions can be flashed via LAF without cryptographic signature verification failing, indicating secure boot is not enforced for LAF operations
  5. Verify boot chain integrity status
    Reboot the device after LAF partition modifications and check if the device passes verified boot checks (on supported devices, check 'dm-verity' status or bootloader verification status)
    Affected if The device boots successfully with modified unsigned partitions or shows no signature verification errors, indicating the boot chain integrity can be broken

A device is affected if it is an LG device (or runs LG firmware with the LAF component) and the LAF download mode permits writing to protected partitions without signature validation, allowing bypass of secure boot verification.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

OEM firmware update from LG is required to remove or properly secure this undocumented command in the LAF component. Users should apply manufacturer security updates promptly.

Fix this in Android Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation8.0 h
  • Implementation24.0 h
  • Testing16.0 h
  • Review / QA8.0 h
56.0 hours of engineering $9,760
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $15,616.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2018-9364 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2018-9364 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data