CVE-2018-9375
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedIn multiple functions of UserDictionaryProvider.java, there is a possible way to add and delete words in the user dictionary due to a confused deputy. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceIn multiple functions of UserDictionaryProvider.java, a confused deputy vulnerability allows a local attacker to add and delete words in the user dictionary without proper permission validation, leading to local privilege escalation. No user interaction or additional execution privileges are required for exploitation.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 6.0= 6.0.1= 7.0= 7.1.1= 7.1.2= 8.0= 8.1CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify Android versionRun 'getprop ro.build.version.release' in a shell or check Settings > About Phone > Android versionAffected if The version displayed equals 6.0, 6.0.1, 7.0, 7.1.1, 7.1.2, 8.0, or 8.1
-
Check SDK versionRun 'getprop ro.build.version.sdk' to get the numeric SDK version. Affected SDK values are: 23 (6.0), 24 (6.0.1), 25 (7.0), 27 (7.1.1/7.1.2), 26 (8.0), 27 (8.1)Affected if The SDK version matches any of the values corresponding to the affected Android releases listed in the CVE
-
Verify UserDictionaryProvider presenceCheck if the UserDictionary content provider exists by examining /data/data/com.android.providers.userdictionary/ or checking app permissions in Settings > Apps > All > User DictionaryAffected if The UserDictionaryProvider is present and accessible on the device
A device is affected if it runs Android version 6.0 through 8.1 and contains the UserDictionaryProvider component, since the vulnerability allows unauthorized modification of the user dictionary without proper permission checks.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedThis vulnerability requires a platform-level fix in the Android framework. Users should apply available system updates. Developers should review permission handling in content provider implementations to ensure proper permission checks before allowing data modifications.
Android 8.0 (Oreo) or later with July 2018 security patch level
- 1. Check the current Android version on the affected device by navigating to Settings > About Phone > Android version
- 2. Upgrade the device to Android 8.0 (Oreo) or later, which includes the security patch for this vulnerability
- 3. Alternatively, ensure the device receives the latest Android security update available from the device manufacturer
- 4. Verify the security patch level is at least "July 2018" or later by checking Settings > About Phone > Security patch level
- 5. If the device cannot be upgraded to a supported Android version, contact the device manufacturer for available security updates or consider replacing the device
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA3.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,096.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2018-9375 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2018-9375 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data