CVE-2018-9392
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedIn get_binary of vendor/mediatek/proprietary/hardware/connectivity/gps/gps_hal/src/data_coder.c, there is a possible out of bounds write due to a missing bounds check. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with System execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceIn the get_binary function of MediaTek's GPS Hardware Abstraction Layer (data_coder.c), a missing bounds check allows an out-of-bounds write. This occurs when processing binary data without validating buffer limits, potentially allowing a privileged (System-level) attacker to corrupt memory and escalate privileges locally.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE dataall versionsCVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- High
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify MediaTek chipset usageCheck /proc/cpuinfo for 'MediaTek' or 'MTK' in the hardware information, or check system property ro.hardware for mtk valuesAffected if Device uses a MediaTek chipset - only MediaTek-based Android devices are affected
-
Locate MediaTek GPS HAL librarySearch for MediaTek GPS library files in /system/lib/ or /vendor/lib/ - typical names include libgps_mtk.so, libmtk_gps.so, or similar GPS HAL implementations from MediaTekAffected if MediaTek GPS HAL library is present on the device
-
Determine GPS HAL component versionCheck the build info or version metadata of the MediaTek GPS library - use 'ls -la' on the library file or check any version strings within the binary using strings commandAffected if Unable to verify the library version contains the security patch or the specific fix for data_coder.c get_binary function
-
Inspect get_binary function in data_coder.cIf root access is available, extract and examine the data_coder.c or data_coder.o within the GPS HAL library binary - look for bounds checking before buffer write operations in the get_binary functionAffected if The get_binary function lacks proper bounds validation before writing to destination buffers, or the source code is not patched with bounds checks
-
Check Android security patch levelRun 'getprop ro.build.version.security_patch' to see the installed Android security patch levelAffected if The security patch level is earlier than the May 2018 patch that addresses CVE-2018-9392
User is affected if the device uses a MediaTek chipset with the GPS Hardware Abstraction Layer and the get_binary function in data_coder.c lacks bounds checking - this is confirmed by having an unpatched GPS HAL library version or a security patch level predating May 2018.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedAdd proper bounds validation before any buffer write operations in the get_binary function to ensure data length does not exceed destination buffer capacity. Apply the fix through MediaTek's vendor patch process.
Android Security Bulletin July 2018 or later (patch level 2018-07-01 or newer)
- 1. Check the current Android security patch level on the device via Settings > About Phone > Security Patch Level
- 2. Verify if the device has received the July 2018 Android Security Bulletin or later patch level
- 3. If the device is on an older patch level, contact the device manufacturer (OEM) for the appropriate security update
- 4. Apply the OEM-provided system update that includes the July 2018 security patch or later
- 5. Alternatively, if available, upgrade to a newer Android version that includes the patched MediaTek GPS HAL component
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation2.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA3.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,840.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2018-9392 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2018-9392 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data