CVE-2018-9401
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedIn many locations, there is a possible way to access kernel memory in user space due to an incorrect bounds check. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceA kernel-level vulnerability exists where incorrect bounds checking in multiple code locations allows user space processes to access kernel memory. This enables local privilege escalation without requiring any additional execution privileges or user interaction.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE dataall versionsCVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the running kernel versionRun `uname -r` or `uname -a` on the Android device (via ADB shell or terminal emulator) to obtain the kernel version stringAffected if The kernel version is earlier than the version that includes the CVE-2018-9401 fix (for Android, this is typically incorporated in the October 2018 security patch level or later) and does not contain the bounds-checking corrections in the kernel memory management code
-
Check the Android security patch levelOn the Android device, go to Settings > About Phone > Security patch level, or run `getprop ro.build.version.security_patch` via ADB shell to retrieve the installed security patch dateAffected if The security patch level is earlier than October 2018, indicating the device has not received the kernel-level fixes for this vulnerability
-
Verify kernel source includes bounds-checking fixesIf you have access to the kernel source or config, search for commits or code changes related to bounds checking in memory management functions (specifically in kernel memory access paths), or check the kernel config for CONFIG_DEBUG_KMEMLEAK or similar memory debugging features that may indicate awareness of the issueAffected if The running kernel is a mainline or vendor-supplied build without the specific bounds-checking corrections applied to prevent user-to-kernel memory access
-
Confirm privilege escalation exposureAttempt to reproduce the vulnerability condition locally using a proof-of-concept that triggers the incorrect bounds check (if safe and authorized in your testing environment), or review system logs for any unauthorized kernel memory access attemptsAffected if The system allows a local unprivileged process to read or write to kernel memory addresses due to missing bounds validation
A device is affected if it runs an unpatched Android kernel (security patch level before October 2018) that lacks the bounds-checking corrections preventing user space to kernel memory access.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedApply the relevant kernel/OS security patches to address the bounds check errors. This typically involves updating the kernel version or applying vendor-supplied patches.
Android devices should be updated to at least the September 2018 security patch level (2018-09-01 or later) which addresses CVE-2018-9401
- 1. Go to Settings > Security & Privacy > Security update on your Android device
- 2. Check the current Android security patch level
- 3. If the patch level is earlier than the September 2018 security update, apply the available system update
- 4. Navigate to Settings > System > Software Update (or Settings > About Phone > Software Update)
- 5. Download and install any available updates
- 6. After updating, verify the security patch level reflects the September 2018 patch or later
- 7. For enterprise or managed devices, contact your device administrator or mobile device management (MDM) provider for update deployment
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing8.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $6,656.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2018-9401 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2018-9401 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data