CVE-2018-9407
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedIn emmc_rpmb_ioctl of emmc_rpmb.c, there is an Information Disclosure due to a Missing Bounds Check. This could lead to Information Disclosure of kernel data.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceThis is an information disclosure vulnerability in the Linux kernel's eMMC RPMB (Replay Protected Memory Block) driver. The emmc_rpmb_ioctl function lacks proper bounds checking, allowing an attacker to read beyond intended memory boundaries and leak kernel data. RPMB is a secure partition in eMMC storage used for sensitive operations like secure key storage.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE dataall versionsCVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Verify RPMB driver is present in the kernelCheck if the kernel configuration includes MMC_RPMB support: look for 'CONFIG_MMC_RPMB=y' in /boot/config-* or /proc/config.gz, or check /sys/class/mmc_rpmb existsAffected if CONFIG_MMC_RPMB is enabled or /sys/class/mmc_rpmb directory exists, indicating the RPMB driver is compiled into the kernel
-
Identify RPMB device node availabilityCheck for RPMB device files: ls -la /dev/block/rpmb* or ls -la /dev/rpmb*Affected if RPMB device nodes exist (e.g., /dev/block/rpmb0), meaning the secure partition is exposed to userspace
-
Confirm RPMB ioctl interface is accessibleAttempt to access the RPMB driver ioctl interface via the device node or check driver source for emmc_rpmb_ioctl function presence in /proc/kallsyms or System.mapAffected if The emmc_rpmb_ioctl symbol is present in the kernel, indicating the vulnerable function exists
-
Determine if RPMB is actively used on the deviceCheck if any process or service is accessing RPMB devices (e.g., look for mmc_rpmb usage in /proc/*/fd or check for RPMB-related daemons), or examine if RPMB partitions are mountedAffected if Any userspace process or service is actively using the RPMB interface, exposing the vulnerable code path
Any Android device with the eMMC RPMB driver enabled and the RPMB device node exposed to userspace is affected by this vulnerability, regardless of kernel version since all Android versions are impacted.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedApply the kernel patch that adds proper bounds checking to the emmc_rpmb_ioctl function to validate all buffer sizes before accessing memory. This is a kernel-level fix requiring recompilation and deployment of the patched kernel.
Android devices with 2018-12-01 security patch level or later (Android 9 Pie, Android 8.x, or Android 7.x with December 2018 security update)
- Check your current Android version in Settings > About Phone
- Identify your device's carrier or manufacturer to get specific update information
- Navigate to Settings > System > Software Update (or Settings > About Phone > System Updates)
- Check for and install the latest available security update
- If no update is available, contact your device manufacturer or carrier for patch availability timeline
- Alternatively, consider upgrading to a newer Android version (Android 9 or later) that includes the December 2018 security patch level
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation6.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,600.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2018-9407 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2018-9407 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data