CVE-2018-9409
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedIn HWCSession::SetColorModeById of hwc_session.cpp, there is a possible out of bounds write due to a missing bounds check. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceA missing bounds check in HWCSession::SetColorModeById in hwc_session.cpp allows an out of bounds write when setting a color mode. This occurs because the function does not validate the color mode ID index before writing to the color mode array, enabling a local attacker to achieve privilege escalation without user interaction or additional execution privileges.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 8.1CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check Android version is 8.1Run 'getprop ro.build.version.release' or check Settings > About Phone > Android version. Verify the version is exactly 8.1.Affected if The device runs Android 8.1 (API level 27)
-
Identify if Hardware Composer (HWC) is in useCheck /system/lib/hw/ or /vendor/lib/hw/ directories for hwc*.so libraries. Run 'getprop ro.hardware' to identify the device's hardware module.Affected if The device uses the vulnerable HWC implementation in the hardware composer module
-
Verify color mode setting is accessibleInspect if the SetColorModeById function in hwc_session.cpp is reachable through SurfaceFlinger or display configuration APIs. This typically requires the device to have display hardware with color mode support.Affected if The device has a display driver that exposes the SetColorModeById function through HWC
-
Check for vendor patch presenceLook for the bounds check fix in the HWC library binary or source. This cannot be easily detected at runtime without debugging tools - compare the hwc_session.cpp file date or check vendor security bulletin for patch level.Affected if The vendor patch for CVE-2018-9409 has not been applied (patch level predates the fix)
The device is affected if it runs Android 8.1 and uses the vulnerable Hardware Composer (HWC) module without the CVE-2018-9409 patch applied.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedApply the vendor-specific patch for this vulnerability in the hardware composer (HWC) module. The fix requires adding proper bounds validation in SetColorModeById to ensure the color mode index is within valid array bounds before any write operation.
Android 8.1 with December 2018 Security Patch Level or later (or upgrade to Android 9.0/10/11 depending on device support)
- Check the Android Security Patch Level on the device by going to Settings > About Phone > Build Number or Settings > Security > Security Patch Level
- Apply the latest Android security update for Android 8.1 by going to Settings > System > Software Update or checking for updates in Settings > About Phone
- If no update is available through OTA, check with the device manufacturer or carrier for the specific security patch that addresses CVE-2018-9409
- Alternatively, upgrade the device to a newer Android version (9.0 or later) which includes the fix
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing12.0 h
- Review / QA6.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $8,192.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2018-9409 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2018-9409 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data