Junos SpaceApplication · Juniper

CVE-2019-0017

HIGH · 8.8 CVSS v3.0 Published 2019-01-15
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
94/100
Remediation priority · Urgent
Remotely reachable Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
The Junos Space application, which allows Device Image files to be uploaded, has insufficient validity checking which may allow uploading of malicious images or scripts, or other content types. Affected releases are Juniper Networks Junos Space versions prior to 18.3R1.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

Junos Space application has insufficient validation on Device Image file uploads, allowing attackers to upload malicious images, scripts, or other unauthorized content types that could lead to remote code execution or compromise of other users.

MitigationUpgrade Junos Space to version 18.3R1 or later to obtain the fix for proper file type and content validation on uploaded device images.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Junos SpaceApplication
Affected:= 13.3= 14.1= 15.1= 15.2= 16.1= 17.1= 17.2= 18.1= 18.2

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
Low
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify the Junos Space version
    Log into the Junos Space web UI and navigate to Administration > System > Software or use the CLI command 'show version' on the Space appliance. Also check /var/log/junos-space.log for version strings.
    Affected if The installed version matches any of these: 13.3, 14.1, 15.1, 15.2, 16.1, 17.1, 17.2, 18.1, or 18.2
  2. Verify Device Image upload capability is exposed
    In the Junos Space UI, navigate to the Device Management or Image Management section where device images are uploaded. Check if this feature is accessible to users with device management privileges.
    Affected if The Device Image upload feature exists and is accessible to authenticated users (the vulnerability requires this feature to be reachable)
  3. Inspect uploaded image storage locations
    Examine directories where device images are stored on the Junos Space server, typically under /var/cache/junos-space/images or similar paths. Look for file types that are not standard device images (e.g., .jsp, .php, .sh, .exe).
    Affected if Unexpected file types or scripts are present in image storage directories
  4. Review Junos Space audit and access logs
    Check /var/log/junos-space.log and the web UI audit logs for suspicious upload activity, particularly uploads with unusual file extensions, multiple rapid uploads, or uploads containing web shell patterns.
    Affected if Logs show uploads of non-image file types or anomalous upload patterns to the device image feature

You are affected if your Junos Space version is 13.3 through 18.2 and the Device Image upload feature is accessible to authenticated users in your deployment.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Upgrade Junos Space to version 18.3R1 or later to obtain the fix for proper file type and content validation on uploaded device images.

Fix this in Junos Space Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation6.0 h
  • Implementation12.0 h
  • Testing8.0 h
  • Review / QA4.0 h
30.0 hours of engineering $5,280
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $8,448.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2019-0017 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2019-0017 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data