CVE-2019-0037
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedIn a Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol version 6 (DHCPv6) environment, the jdhcpd daemon may crash and restart upon receipt of certain DHCPv6 solicit messages received from a DHCPv6 client. By continuously sending the same crafted packet, an attacker can repeatedly crash the jdhcpd process causing a sustained Denial of Service (DoS) to both IPv4 and IPv6 clients. Affected releases are Juniper Networks Junos OS: 15.1 versions prior to 15.1F6-S12, 15.1R7-S3; 15.1X49 versions prior to 15.1X49-D171, 15.1X49-D180; 15.1X53 versions prior to 15.1X53-D236, 15.1X53-D496; 16.1 versions prior to 16.1R3-S10, 16.1R7-S4; 16.2 versions prior to 16.2R2-S8; 17.1 versions prior to 17.1R2-S10, 17.1R3; 17.2 versions prior to 17.2R1-S8, 17.2R3-S1; 17.3 versions prior to 17.3R3-S3; 17.4 versions prior to 17.4R1-S6, 17.4R2-S3; 18.1 versions prior to 18.1R2-S4, 18.1R3-S2; 18.2 versions prior to 18.2R2; 18.2X75 versions prior to 18.2X75-D30; 18.3 versions prior to 18.3R1-S2. This issue does not affect Junos OS releases prior to 15.1.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceA memory corruption or parsing error in the jdhcpd daemon causes a crash when processing specially crafted DHCPv6 solicit messages. An unauthenticated remote attacker can send these packets to trigger the crash, and by continuously resending the crafted packet, can maintain a sustained denial of service affecting both IPv4 and IPv6 DHCP clients.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 15.1= 15.1x49-d30= 15.1x49-d60= 15.1x49-d140= 15.1x49-d150= 15.1x49-d160= 15.1x53-d50= 15.1x53-d51= 15.1x53-d52= 15.1x53-d55= 15.1x53-d57= 15.1x53-d58CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the Junos OS versionRun 'show version' or 'show version detail' on the Juniper device CLI to obtain the installed Junos versionAffected if The displayed version matches any of these exact versions: 15.1, 15.1X49-D30, 15.1X49-D60, 15.1X49-D140, 15.1X49-D150, 15.1X49-D160, 15.1X53-D50, 15.1X53-D51, 15.1X53-D52, 15.1X53-D55, 15.1X53-D57, or 15.1X53-D58
-
Confirm jdhcpd daemon is runningRun 'show system processes extensive | match jdhcpd' or check daemon status via 'show system services dhcp'Affected if The jdhcpd daemon is active and processing DHCP requests
-
Verify DHCPv6 service is enabledRun 'show system services dhcpv6' to check if DHCPv6 service is configuredAffected if DHCPv6 service is enabled and accepting solicit messages on the device
-
Check for recent jdhcpd crash indicatorsRun 'show system core-dumps' and review system logs with 'show log messages | match jdhcpd' for crash or daemon restart entriesAffected if Recent crashes or unexpected restarts of the jdhcpd daemon are logged and correlate with DHCPv6 traffic
You are affected if your Junos version exactly matches one of the 15.1 variants listed AND the jdhcpd daemon with DHCPv6 is running on your device.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataApply the appropriate Junos OS version update listed in the advisory (e.g., 15.1F6-S12, 15.1X49-D171, 16.1R3-S10, etc.) or later. If immediate patching is not feasible, consider blocking DHCPv6 traffic from untrusted sources at network boundaries.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation2.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,304.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2019-0037 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2019-0037 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data