CVE-2019-0187
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedUnauthenticated RCE is possible when JMeter is used in distributed mode (-r or -R command line options). Attacker can establish a RMI connection to a jmeter-server using RemoteJMeterEngine and proceed with an attack using untrusted data deserialization. This only affect tests running in Distributed mode. Note that versions before 4.0 are not able to encrypt traffic between the nodes, nor authenticate the participating nodes so upgrade to JMeter 5.1 is also advised.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceUnauthenticated remote code execution is possible when Apache JMeter operates in distributed testing mode (-r or -R flags). Attackers can establish a malicious RMI connection to the jmeter-server and exploit unsafe deserialization through RemoteJMeterEngine to execute arbitrary code. This vulnerability only affects distributed mode deployments where jmeter-server instances communicate over RMI.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 4.0= 5.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify installed JMeter versionRun 'jmeter --version' or check the lib folder for the ApacheJMeter.jar version. On Linux/Mac: cat bin/jmeter 2>/dev/null | grep -i version or check the downloaded archive filename. On Windows: check the JMeter installation directory or Control Panel programs list.Affected if Version is exactly 4.0 or 5.0 (as shown by the version output)
-
Check if distributed/remote testing is configuredSearch for 'remote_hosts' in jmeter.properties (bin/ folder) or user.properties. Also check for 'server.rmi.localport' setting. Look for any remoteHosts entries. Command: grep -r 'remote_hosts\|server.rmi' bin/*.properties 2>/dev/nullAffected if remote_hosts is defined (non-empty) or server.rmi.* properties are present and configured
-
Verify if jmeter-server is run or exposedCheck for running jmeter-server processes: 'ps aux | grep jmeter-server' on Linux/Mac or check Task Manager on Windows. Also check for scripts that invoke jmeter-server directly, particularly with -r or -R flags.Affected if jmeter-server is running as a daemon/service or scripts invoke jmeter with -r or -R flags
-
Inspect RMI port exposureCheck jmeter.properties for 'server.rmi.port' and 'server.rmi.localport' settings. Default RMI port is 1099. Determine if the host is listening on RMI ports: 'netstat -an | grep 1099' or 'ss -tlnp | grep 1099'Affected if RMI ports (typically 1099 or configured custom port) are open and listening
You are affected if you run JMeter version 4.0 or 5.0 AND have distributed mode (remote testing) enabled with jmeter-server exposed, making RMI connections accessible to untrusted networks.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedIf distributed mode is not required, disable it. If required, upgrade to JMeter 5.1+ and restrict network access to jmeter-server RMI ports using firewall rules or network segmentation to prevent unauthenticated connections.
JMeter 5.1 or later
- 1. Back up your existing JMeter test plans and configurations
- 2. Download Apache JMeter 5.1 or later from the official Apache JMeter website (https://jmeter.apache.org/)
- 3. Install JMeter 5.1+ on all nodes in your distributed test environment
- 4. Ensure all client and server nodes run the same version
- 5. For additional security, configure SSL/TLS for RMI communication in jmeter.properties or system.properties
- 6. Test your distributed setup with the new version before production use
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,168.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2019-0187 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2019-0187 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data