Treasury And Risk ManagementApplication · Sap

CVE-2019-0280

HIGH · 8.8 CVSS v3.0 Published 2019-05-14
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
94/100
Remediation priority · Urgent
Remotely reachable Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
SAP Treasury and Risk Management (EA-FINSERV 6.0, 6.03, 6.04, 6.05, 6.06, 6.16, 6.17, 6.18 and 8.0; S4CORE 1.01, 1.02 and 1.03), does not perform necessary authorization checks for authorization objects T_DEAL_DP and T_DEAL_PD , resulting in escalation of privileges.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

SAP Treasury and Risk Management fails to enforce authorization checks on authorization objects T_DEAL_DP and T_DEAL_PD, allowing authenticated users to perform operations outside their intended privilege level. This enables privilege escalation within the Treasury module.

MitigationImplement proper authorization checks for T_DEAL_DP and T_DEAL_PD objects in the affected SAP modules. Review and adjust user role assignments to ensure least-privilege access to deal processing and deal portfolio functions.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Treasury And Risk ManagementApplication
Affected:= 6.0= 6.03= 6.04= 6.05= 6.06= 6.16= 6.17= 6.18= 8.0

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
Low
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Check installed SAP Treasury version
    Use SAP transaction code SMAN or system reports to determine the exact version of SAP Treasury and Risk Management installed in your system
    Affected if The installed version matches any of these: 6.0, 6.03, 6.04, 6.05, 6.06, 6.16, 6.17, 6.18, or 8.0
  2. Verify authorization object T_DEAL_DP existence
    Use transaction code SU03 or SU21 to search for and inspect authorization object T_DEAL_DP in the system
    Affected if The authorization object T_DEAL_DP exists in the system without proper field checks or with incomplete authorization maintenance
  3. Verify authorization object T_DEAL_PD existence
    Use transaction code SU03 or SU21 to search for and inspect authorization object T_DEAL_PD in the system
    Affected if The authorization object T_DEAL_PD exists in the system without proper field checks or with incomplete authorization maintenance
  4. Review user roles containing affected objects
    Use transaction code PFCG to search for roles that include T_DEAL_DP or T_DEAL_PD authorization objects and examine their defined values
    Affected if Roles grant overly broad access to these objects allowing operations beyond the intended privilege level
  5. Check transaction execution without proper authorization
    Test executing Treasury deal processing transactions (such as transaction codes related to deal portfolio management) using a low-privilege user account to see if operations succeed without proper authorization
    Affected if Low-privilege users can perform deal processing or portfolio operations that should require higher-level authorization

You are affected if your SAP Treasury version is 6.0, 6.03, 6.04, 6.05, 6.06, 6.16, 6.17, 6.18, or 8.0 AND the authorization objects T_DEAL_DP or T_DEAL_PD are present without proper field-level authorization checks.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Implement proper authorization checks for T_DEAL_DP and T_DEAL_PD objects in the affected SAP modules. Review and adjust user role assignments to ensure least-privilege access to deal processing and deal portfolio functions.

Fix this in Treasury And Risk Management Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation6.0 h
  • Implementation12.0 h
  • Testing6.0 h
  • Review / QA4.0 h
28.0 hours of engineering $4,980
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $7,968.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2019-0280 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2019-0280 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data