ZeppelinApplication · Apache

CVE-2019-10095

CRITICAL · 9.8 CVSS v3.1 Published 2021-09-02
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to after 0.9.0 or later.
See remediation →
100/100
Remediation priority · Urgent
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
bash command injection vulnerability in Apache Zeppelin allows an attacker to inject system commands into Spark interpreter settings. This issue affects Apache Zeppelin Apache Zeppelin version 0.9.0 and prior versions.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

A bash command injection vulnerability in Apache Zeppelin versions 0.9.0 and prior allows authenticated or unauthenticated attackers to inject and execute arbitrary system commands through Spark interpreter settings, potentially leading to full system compromise.

MitigationUpgrade Apache Zeppelin to a version that addresses this vulnerability, or implement network-level access controls to restrict who can access the Zeppelin interface and configure interpreter settings.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
ZeppelinApplication
Affected:<= 0.9.0

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify Apache Zeppelin installation and version
    Locate Zeppelin installation directory and check the version. Common locations: /opt/zeppelin, /usr/local/zeppelin, or check pom.xml if built from source. Run: find / -name 'zeppelin-server*.jar' 2>/dev/null or check a known version file if it exists in your deployment
    Affected if Apache Zeppelin version is 0.9.0 or lower, or if you cannot confirm the version is higher than 0.9.0
  2. Verify Spark interpreter is enabled
    Check Zeppelin interpreter configuration. Typically found in interpreter.json or through the Zeppelin UI at Interpreter settings page. Look for 'spark' interpreter entry with 'enabled' status set to true
    Affected if The Spark interpreter is enabled and configured in your Zeppelin deployment
  3. Confirm network accessibility of Zeppelin UI
    Check if Zeppelin web interface is exposed to untrusted networks. Review firewall rules, reverse proxy configuration, or cloud security groups allowing access to Zeppelin port (default 8080). Run: netstat -tlnp | grep -E '8080|8081' or review your reverse proxy/load balancer configuration
    Affected if Zeppelin UI is accessible from networks where untrusted users exist, regardless of authentication being enabled
  4. Check authentication configuration
    Review Zeppelin security settings in shiro.ini or equivalent configuration file. Verify whether anonymous access is permitted or if authentication is enforced for interpreter configuration pages
    Affected if Anonymous access is allowed OR if authentication is enabled but weak/default credentials may be in use, allowing authenticated attackers to reach interpreter settings

Your environment is affected if you run Apache Zeppelin version 0.9.0 or lower with the Spark interpreter enabled and the Zeppelin interface accessible to potential attackers, regardless of authentication status.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Upgrade available Upgrade to a release after 0.9.0
Interim mitigation

Upgrade Apache Zeppelin to a version that addresses this vulnerability, or implement network-level access controls to restrict who can access the Zeppelin interface and configure interpreter settings.

Fix this in Zeppelin Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation4.0 h
  • Implementation8.0 h
  • Testing6.0 h
  • Review / QA4.0 h
22.0 hours of engineering $3,860
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $6,176.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2019-10095 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2019-10095 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data