CVE-2019-10149
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA flaw was found in Exim versions 4.87 to 4.91 (inclusive). Improper validation of recipient address in deliver_message() function in /src/deliver.c may lead to remote command execution.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceImproper validation of recipient addresses in Exim's deliver_message() function allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary commands via specially crafted email addresses, leading to remote code execution with elevated privileges.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 18.04= 18.10= 9.0>= 4.87, <= 4.91CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Confirm Exim is installedRun 'exim --version' or check package manager (dpkg -l | grep exim, rpm -qa | grep exim)Affected if Exim is not installed, then not affected
-
Determine installed Exim versionRun 'exim --version' to see the exact version numberAffected if Version is >= 4.87 and <= 4.91, then vulnerable
-
Check if Exim SMTP daemon is runningRun 'systemctl status exim' or 'ps aux | grep exim'Affected if Exim is not running, then not currently exploitable
-
Verify SMTP listener is network-exposedRun 'netstat -tlnp | grep :25' or 'ss -tlnp | grep :25' to see if Exim is listening on 0.0.0.0:25 or :::25 rather than only 127.0.0.1:25Affected if Listening on all interfaces (0.0.0.0 or :::), then vulnerable to remote attack
-
Check Exim configuration for external connectionsReview /etc/exim4/exim4.conf or /etc/exim/exim.conf for 'listen' or 'interface' settings, and check for any ACLs that might restrict who can inject messagesAffected if No network restrictions configured, then likely exposed to remote exploitation
User is affected if Exim version 4.87-4.91 is running and listening on a network interface, allowing unauthenticated remote attackers to send specially crafted recipient addresses.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedUpgrade Exim to version 4.92 or later. If immediate patching is not feasible, restrict external access to port 25 or implement network-level filtering to reduce exposure to this vulnerability.
Exim 4.92 or later
- 1. Check current Exim version by running: exim --version or dpkg -l | grep exim
- 2. Backup Exim configuration directory: cp -r /etc/exim /etc/exim.backup
- 3. Update package repositories: sudo apt-get update
- 4. Upgrade Exim to version 4.92 or later: sudo apt-get install exim4 (or exim)
- 5. Verify the installed version: exim --version and confirm it is 4.92 or higher
- 6. Test mail functionality to ensure Exim is operational after upgrade
- 7. Review Exim configuration for any settings that may need adjustment for the new version
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation2.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,984.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2019-10149 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sources- www.openwall.com
- packetstormsecurity.com
- www.exim.org
- www.openwall.com
- lists.opensuse.org
- packetstormsecurity.com
- packetstormsecurity.com
- packetstormsecurity.com
- seclists.org
- www.openwall.com
- www.openwall.com
- www.openwall.com
- www.openwall.com
- www.openwall.com
- www.openwall.com
- www.securityfocus.com
- bugzilla.redhat.com
- seclists.org
- security.gentoo.org
- usn.ubuntu.com
- www.debian.org
- www.openwall.com
- www.cisa.gov
- nvd.nist.gov
Practitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2019-10149 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data