Virtualization ManagerApplication · Redhat

CVE-2019-10194

MEDIUM · 5.5 CVSS v3.1 Published 2019-07-11
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
57/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Sensitive passwords used in deployment and configuration of oVirt Metrics, all versions. were found to be insufficiently protected. Passwords could be disclosed in log files (if playbooks are run with -v) or in playbooks stored on Metrics or Bastion hosts.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

Sensitive passwords used in oVirt Metrics deployment and configuration are being logged in plaintext when Ansible playbooks run with verbose mode (-v) or are stored in plaintext within playbooks on Metrics or Bastion hosts, leading to credential disclosure.

MitigationRotate all exposed passwords immediately, remove plaintext credentials from playbooks, implement secure credential storage (e.g., Ansible Vault, secrets management), avoid verbose logging of playbook execution, and clean or secure log files containing exposed credentials.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Virtualization ManagerApplication
Affected:= 4.3
OvirtApplication
Affected:all versions

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Local
Complexity
Low
Privileges
Low
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
None
Availability
None

CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Check if oVirt Metrics or Bastion hosts exist in your environment
    Inventory your infrastructure for hosts designated as Metrics or Bastion servers that were deployed as part of oVirt setup
    Affected if You have Metrics or Bastion hosts deployed as part of your oVirt environment
  2. Identify Ansible playbooks used for oVirt deployment
    Locate any Ansible playbooks or playbook files stored on Metrics or Bastion hosts, or in your deployment repository, that were used to configure oVirt
    Affected if Deployment playbooks are stored on these hosts
  3. Inspect playbooks for hardcoded plaintext passwords
    Search playbook files for password= or passwd= parameters and other credential assignments, looking for plaintext values rather than variable references
    Affected if Playbooks contain hardcoded passwords in plaintext rather than using variable references or secure credential storage
  4. Review Ansible log files for credential exposure
    Examine Ansible log files on Metrics or Bastion hosts, and any centralized logging locations, for plaintext passwords that may have been printed during playbook execution with verbose mode
    Affected if Verbose mode (-v or higher) was used during playbook execution and logs contain plaintext passwords
  5. Check for verbose logging configuration
    Review Ansible configuration files (ansible.cfg) and any automation scripts to determine if verbose logging was enabled during deployment
    Affected if Verbose logging was enabled in Ansible configuration or command execution

Your environment is affected if you deployed oVirt Metrics or Bastion hosts using Ansible playbooks that contain plaintext passwords or were run with verbose logging, resulting in credential exposure in logs or playbook files.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Rotate all exposed passwords immediately, remove plaintext credentials from playbooks, implement secure credential storage (e.g., Ansible Vault, secrets management), avoid verbose logging of playbook execution, and clean or secure log files containing exposed credentials.

Fix this in Virtualization Manager Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation6.0 h
  • Implementation12.0 h
  • Testing6.0 h
  • Review / QA4.0 h
28.0 hours of engineering $4,980
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $7,968.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2019-10194 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2019-10194 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data