Xebialabs Xl DeployApplication · Jenkins

CVE-2019-10304

MEDIUM · 6.5 CVSS v3.0 Published 2019-04-18
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to after 7.5.3 or later.
See remediation →
72/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
Remotely reachable No privileges

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
A cross-site request forgery vulnerability in Jenkins XebiaLabs XL Deploy Plugin in the Credential#doValidateUserNamePassword form validation method allows attackers to initiate a connection to an attacker-specified server.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

A cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the Jenkins XebiaLabs XL Deploy plugin's Credential#doValidateUserNamePassword form validation method allows authenticated users to be tricked into initiating connections to attacker-specified servers. The form validation endpoint lacks proper CSRF token (crumb) validation.

MitigationUpdate to the latest version of the XL Deploy plugin which implements CSRF protection (crumb validation) on the Credential#doValidateUserNamePassword form validation method. Until patched, limit plugin access to trusted users only.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Xebialabs Xl DeployApplication
Affected:<= 7.5.3

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
Required
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
None
Integrity
High
Availability
None

CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Verify XL Deploy plugin is installed
    Navigate to Manage Jenkins > Manage Plugins > Installed and search for 'XL Deploy' or 'Xebialabs', or inspect the plugin directory $JENKINS_HOME/plugins/ for the xl-deploy plugin folder
    Affected if The XL Deploy plugin is present in the Jenkins installation
  2. Determine installed XL Deploy plugin version
    In Jenkins UI: Manage Jenkins > Manage Plugins > Installed > XL Deploy plugin - note the version column. Alternatively, inspect $JENKINS_HOME/plugins/xl-deploy/META-INF/MANIFEST.MF for the Bundle-Version attribute
    Affected if The installed version is 7.5.3 or lower (any version <= 7.5.3)
  3. Confirm plugin is enabled and loaded
    Check Manage Jenkins > Manage Plugins > Installed tab - ensure XL Deploy shows as 'Enabled' and there are no errors in Manage Jenkins > System Information related to the plugin
    Affected if The plugin is enabled and loaded without errors
  4. Verify the Credential form validation endpoint exists
    Inspect the plugin's archived .hpi file for the Credential.java class containing the doValidateUserNamePassword method, or access the URL pattern /descriptorByName/XLDeployCredential/validateUserNamePassword if the plugin is active
    Affected if The Credential#doValidateUserNamePassword form validation endpoint is accessible (which is the case when the plugin is installed and enabled)

You are affected if the XL Deploy plugin is installed, enabled, and its version is 7.5.3 or lower, as this version range lacks CSRF crumb validation on the Credential form validation endpoint.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Upgrade available Upgrade to a release after 7.5.3
Interim mitigation

Update to the latest version of the XL Deploy plugin which implements CSRF protection (crumb validation) on the Credential#doValidateUserNamePassword form validation method. Until patched, limit plugin access to trusted users only.

Fix this in Xebialabs Xl Deploy Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation1.0 h
  • Implementation2.0 h
  • Testing2.0 h
  • Review / QA1.0 h
6.0 hours of engineering $1,040
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,664.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2019-10304 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2019-10304 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data