Port AllocatorApplication · Jenkins
CVE-2019-10350
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedJenkins Port Allocator Plugin stores credentials unencrypted in job config.xml files on the Jenkins master where they can be viewed by users with Extended Read permission, or access to the master file system.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThe Jenkins Port Allocator Plugin stores credentials unencrypted within job config.xml files on the Jenkins master. Users with Extended Read permission can view these credentials via the UI, or anyone with filesystem access to the master can read them directly from the XML files.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data
Port AllocatorApplication
<= 1.8CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check Port Allocator Plugin versionNavigate to Manage Jenkins > Manage Plugins > Installed tab and search for 'Port Allocator' to confirm the installed version numberAffected if The plugin version is 1.8 or lower
-
Identify jobs using Port AllocatorSearch job config.xml files for the presence of the '<portAllocators>' or '<portAllocator>' XML element within the Jenkins jobs directory (typically $JENKINS_HOME/jobs/*/config.xml)Affected if Any job config.xml contains Port Allocator configuration elements
-
Inspect credentials in job config.xmlOpen the job config.xml files identified with Port Allocator and search for plaintext credentials within the <credentials> or <portAllocator> XML sectionsAffected if Credentials appear as plaintext values (not <secret> encrypted elements or Jenkins credential store references)
-
Check for Extended Read permissionReview user permissions in Jenkins at Manage Jenkins > Manage Users and in any authorization matrix configuration, looking for users or groups granted Extended Read permissionAffected if Any user account or group has Extended Read permission enabled
The environment is affected if Port Allocator Plugin version 1.8 or lower is installed, any job config.xml files contain Port Allocator configuration with plaintext credentials, and users with Extended Read permission exist in the system.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataIdentify and remove stored credentials from affected job configurations, update the Port Allocator Plugin to a version that encrypts credentials, and rotate any exposed credentials as a precaution.
Fix this in Port Allocator
Scoped from the published advisory
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation3.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,272.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2019-10350 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2019-10350 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data