EggplantApplication · Jenkins
CVE-2019-10385
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedJenkins eggPlant Plugin 2.2 and earlier stores credentials unencrypted in job config.xml files on the Jenkins master where they can be viewed by users with Extended Read permission, or access to the master file system.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThe Jenkins eggPlant Plugin version 2.2 and earlier stores credentials in plain text within job config.xml files on the Jenkins master. Users with Extended Read permission or attackers with file system access to the master can view these unencrypted credentials.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data
EggplantApplication
<= 2.2CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify eggPlant Plugin versionNavigate to Manage Jenkins > Manage Plugins > Installed tab and locate the eggPlant Plugin in the list. Note its version number.Affected if The installed version is 2.2 or earlier.
-
Find jobs using eggPlant pluginSearch job config.xml files for elements related to eggPlant integration. Look in $JENKINS_HOME/jobs/<jobname>/config.xml for any <eggplant> or related configuration sections.Affected if Jobs contain eggPlant plugin configuration in their config.xml files.
-
Inspect credentials storage in job configsOpen job config.xml files that use eggPlant and search for stored credential fields. Look for password, username, or credential-related XML elements that contain unencrypted/plain text values.Affected if Credentials appear as plain text values within the config.xml rather than in encrypted <credentials> blocks or Jenkins credential bindings.
-
Check for Extended Read permission usersReview user permissions in Jenkins under Manage Jenkins > Manage Users and check which users or groups have Extended Read permission enabled.Affected if Users with Extended Read permission exist in the Jenkins instance.
If the eggPlant Plugin version is 2.2 or earlier and job config.xml files contain plain text credentials (rather than encrypted bindings), the environment is affected by this vulnerability.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataUpdate the eggPlant Plugin to a version newer than 2.2, rotate any credentials that may have been exposed, and migrate credentials to use Jenkins' built-in credential storage mechanisms.
Fix this in Eggplant
Scoped from the published advisory
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation12.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA3.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $6,720.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2019-10385 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2019-10385 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data