CVE-2019-10483
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedSide channel issue in QTEE due to usage of non-time-constant comparison function such as memcmp or strcmp in Snapdragon Auto, Snapdragon Compute, Snapdragon Connectivity, Snapdragon Consumer Electronics Connectivity, Snapdragon Consumer IOT, Snapdragon Industrial IOT, Snapdragon IoT, Snapdragon Mobile, Snapdragon Voice & Music, Snapdragon Wearables, Snapdragon Wired Infrastructure and Networking in APQ8009, APQ8016, APQ8017, APQ8053, APQ8076, APQ8096, APQ8096AU, APQ8098, IPQ8074, MDM9150, MDM9205, MDM9206, MDM9207C, MDM9607, MDM9640, MDM9650, MDM9655, MSM8905, MSM8909, MSM8909W, MSM8917, MSM8920, MSM8937, MSM8940, MSM8953, MSM8996, MSM8996AU, MSM8998, QCA8081, QCS404, QCS605, QM215, SDA660, SDA845, SDM429, SDM439, SDM450, SDM630, SDM632, SDM636, SDM660, SDM670, SDM710, SDM845, SDM850, SDX20, SDX55, SM6150, SM7150, SM8150, SXR1130, SXR2130
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceTiming side-channel vulnerability in Qualcomm's QTEE (Trusted Execution Environment) where non-time-constant comparison functions (memcmp/strcmp) are used. An attacker with precise timing measurements could potentially infer sensitive information (keys, credentials) by observing execution time differences during comparison operations.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE dataall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsCVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the Qualcomm chipset model in your deviceCheck device specifications, system information, or /proc/cpuinfo to identify the APQ chipset (Apq8009, Apq8016, Apq8017, Apq8053, Apq8076, Apq8096, Apq8096au, or Apq8098)Affected if The device contains any of the listed affected chipset models (Apq8009, Apq8016, Apq8017, Apq8053, Apq8076, Apq8096, Apq8096au, or Apq8098)
-
Determine the firmware version of the Qualcomm chipsetQuery the device's firmware version through manufacturer tools, bootloader information, or system firmware logs (often accessible via getprop on Android or manufacturer diagnostic software)Affected if The installed firmware version predates the CVE-2019-10483 patch (released October 2019) or the firmware version cannot be determined
-
Check if QTEE (Trusted Execution Environment) is enabled on the deviceInspect TEE status through device diagnostic interfaces, security settings, or by checking /dev/tz or similar TEE driver entries that indicate QTEE is activeAffected if QTEE is active and running on the affected chipset without the timing-side-channel patch applied
-
Verify security patch level on the deviceCheck the device security patch level through system settings (Android: Settings > About Phone > Security Patch Level) or by querying the build fingerprint or ro.build.version.security_patch propertyAffected if The security patch level is earlier than October 2019 or cannot be verified, indicating the CVE fix has not been applied
A user is affected if their device uses any of the listed Qualcomm APQ chipsets (Apq8009, Apq8016, Apq8017, Apq8053, Apq8076, Apq8096, Apq8096au, or Apq8098) and the firmware has not been updated with the October 2019 or later security patch that addresses the timing side-channel in QTEE.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataApply vendor firmware/security patch from Qualcomm to affected chipsets. Device manufacturers must integrate and distribute the patch through OTA updates. For devices no longer supported, consider network-level mitigations or device replacement.
- Consultation6.0 h
- Implementation12.0 h
- Testing8.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $8,448.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2019-10483 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2019-10483 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data