CVE-2019-10562
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedu'Improper authentication and signature verification of debug polices in secure boot loader will allow unverified debug policies to be loaded into secure memory and leads to memory corruption' in Snapdragon Auto, Snapdragon Compute, Snapdragon Connectivity, Snapdragon Consumer IOT, Snapdragon Industrial IOT, Snapdragon Mobile, Snapdragon Wired Infrastructure and Networking in IPQ6018, Kamorta, MSM8998, Nicobar, QCS404, QCS605, QCS610, Rennell, SA415M, SA6155P, SC7180, SDA660, SDA845, SDM630, SDM636, SDM660, SDM670, SDM710, SDM845, SDM850, SDX24, SDX55, SM6150, SM7150, SM8150, SM8250, SXR1130, SXR2130
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThe secure boot loader in affected Qualcomm Snapdragon chipsets fails to properly authenticate and verify signatures on debug policies before loading them into secure memory. This allows unverified or malicious debug policies to be loaded, leading to memory corruption and potential privilege escalation.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE dataall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsCVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the chipset model in your deviceCheck your device documentation, hardware specifications, or use system commands (such as 'cat /proc/cpuinfo' or 'lspci' on Linux-based embedded systems) to determine the exact Qualcomm Snapdragon chipset present.Affected if The chipset matches any of the following: Ipq6018, Kamorta, Msm8998, Nicobar, Qcs404, Qcs605, Qcs610, or Rennell.
-
Confirm the firmware versionRetrieve the firmware version from your device's bootloader, UEFI settings, or system information interface (such as 'dmidecode' or vendor-specific diagnostic tools).Affected if The firmware version corresponds to any of the affected chipsets listed above, regardless of version number (all versions are affected).
-
Verify secure boot statusCheck your device's secure boot configuration in UEFI/bootloader settings, or use vendor-provided tools to query the secure boot state. Look for whether secure boot is enabled and functioning.Affected if Secure boot is disabled, not properly configured, or fails to enforce signature verification on loaded policies.
-
Check for debug policy configurationInspect the bootloader or secure boot configuration for any debug policy settings or features. Look for debug policy loading mechanisms in the boot sequence.Affected if Debug policies can be loaded without signature verification, or debug policy loading is enabled without proper authentication checks.
-
Review boot logs for policy loading anomaliesExamine boot logs, bootloader debug output, or secure boot event logs for any warnings, failures, or unusual messages related to policy loading, signature verification, or memory initialization.Affected if Logs show failed signature checks, unverified policies being loaded, or memory corruption events during the boot process.
Your environment is affected if your device uses any of the listed Qualcomm Snapdragon chipset models (Ipq6018, Kamorta, Msm8998, Nicobar, Qcs404, Qcs605, Qcs610, or Rennell) and you rely on the secure boot loader to verify debug policy signatures before loading into secure memory.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataApply vendor-supplied firmware updates that patch the secure boot loader to enforce proper signature verification on debug policies before loading into secure memory.
- Consultation8.0 h
- Implementation16.0 h
- Testing12.0 h
- Review / QA8.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $12,352.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2019-10562 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2019-10562 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data