CVE-2019-10588
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedCopying RTCP messages into the output buffer without checking the destination buffer size which could lead to a remote stack overflow. in Snapdragon Auto, Snapdragon Compute, Snapdragon Consumer IOT, Snapdragon Industrial IOT, Snapdragon IoT, Snapdragon Mobile, Snapdragon Voice & Music, Snapdragon Wearables in APQ8009, APQ8017, APQ8053, APQ8076, APQ8096, APQ8096AU, APQ8098, MDM9150, MDM9206, MDM9607, MDM9615, MDM9625, MDM9635M, MDM9640, MDM9645, MDM9650, MDM9655, MSM8905, MSM8909, MSM8909W, MSM8917, MSM8920, MSM8937, MSM8940, MSM8953, MSM8996AU, MSM8998, QCM2150, QCS605, QM215, Rennell, SC7180, SC8180X, SDA660, SDA845, SDM429, SDM429W, SDM439, SDM450, SDM630, SDM632, SDM636, SDM660, SDM670, SDM710, SDM845, SDM850, SDX20, SDX24, SDX55, SM6150, SM7150, SM8150, SXR1130
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceStack-based buffer overflow vulnerability in Qualcomm Snapdragon chipset firmware where RTCP (Real-time Transport Control Protocol) messages are copied to an output buffer without validating the destination buffer size, allowing a remote attacker to overflow the stack and potentially execute arbitrary code.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE dataall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsCVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the Qualcomm chipset model in the deviceCheck device specifications, system information, or baseband/modem firmware details to determine if the chipset is one of: Apq8009, Apq8017, Apq8053, Apq8076, Apq8096, Apq8096au, or Mdm9150Affected if The device uses any of the listed chipset models, as all firmware versions for these chipsets are affected
-
Confirm the baseband/modem processor handles RTCP trafficInspect network traffic or examine the modem firmware configuration to determine if RTCP (Real-time Transport Control Protocol) processing is enabled on the deviceAffected if RTCP message processing is active on the device's baseband processor
-
Check the baseband/modem firmware versionAccess the modem/baseband firmware version through device diagnostics, engineering mode, or manufacturer support - compare against any available patch information from the OEMAffected if The firmware version has not received a security patch addressing CVE-2019-10588 from the device manufacturer
-
Verify the device OEM support statusContact the device manufacturer or check their security advisory pages for information on CVE-2019-10588 patches for your specific device modelAffected if The OEM has not released a firmware update addressing this vulnerability for your device model
A device is affected if it contains any of the listed Qualcomm chipsets (Apq8009, Apq8017, Apq8053, Apq8076, Apq8096, Apq8096au, or Mdm9150) and the baseband firmware has not been patched by the device OEM to address the RTCP buffer overflow vulnerability.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataThis is a firmware-level vulnerability in the baseband/modem processor that requires a security patch from the device OEM (who sources the Snapdragon chipset). Users must apply firmware updates from their device manufacturers. No application-level mitigation is possible.
- Consultation60.0 h
- Implementation120.0 h
- Testing80.0 h
- Review / QA40.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $84,480.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2019-10588 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2019-10588 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data