CVE-2019-10906
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedIn Pallets Jinja before 2.10.1, str.format_map allows a sandbox escape.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceIn Pallets Jinja2 before version 2.10.1, the str.format_map method can be exploited to escape the template sandbox and access underlying Python objects, potentially allowing arbitrary code execution or information disclosure.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 28= 29= 30= 12.04= 14.04= 16.04= 18.04= 18.10= 19.04= 1.0< 2.10.1= 15.0= 42.3CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check installed Jinja2 versionRun `pip show jinja2` or check your package manager (e.g., `rpm -q python-jinja2`, `dpkg -l python-jinja2`) to identify the installed version numberAffected if The version is lower than 2.10.1
-
Identify if templates process untrusted user inputReview your application code to determine whether Jinja2 templates are being rendered with data that originates from external or untrusted sources (e.g., user form submissions, API inputs, external APIs)Affected if Untrusted input is directly passed to template rendering without sanitization
-
Verify if the Jinja2 sandbox is enabledSearch your codebase for `SandboxedEnvironment` usage. Check if templates are loaded via `Environment(loader=...).get_template()` or if `sandbox.SandboxedEnvironment` is explicitly usedAffected if The sandbox is being relied upon for security and the Jinja2 version is below 2.10.1
-
Confirm str.format_map usage in templatesSearch your template files for the pattern `{0.format_map}` or similar, which invokes the vulnerable str.format_map method within template expressionsAffected if Templates contain str.format_map calls and Jinja2 is below version 2.10.1
You are affected if Jinja2 version is below 2.10.1 and your application renders templates with untrusted input while relying on the sandbox for security.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor data2.10.1
Upgrade Jinja2 to version 2.10.1 or later. If immediate upgrade is not possible, disable untrusted template input or implement additional input validation.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation2.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,072.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2019-10906 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sources- palletsprojects.com
- lists.opensuse.org
- lists.opensuse.org
- access.redhat.com
- access.redhat.com
- access.redhat.com
- usn.ubuntu.com
- usn.ubuntu.com
- lists.apache.org
- lists.apache.org
- lists.apache.org
- lists.apache.org
- lists.apache.org
- lists.apache.org
- lists.apache.org
- lists.apache.org
- lists.fedoraproject.org
- lists.fedoraproject.org
- lists.fedoraproject.org
- nvd.nist.gov
Practitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2019-10906 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data