CVE-2019-11581
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedThere was a server-side template injection vulnerability in Jira Server and Data Center, in the ContactAdministrators and the SendBulkMail actions. An attacker is able to remotely execute code on systems that run a vulnerable version of Jira Server or Data Center. All versions of Jira Server and Data Center from 4.4.0 before 7.6.14, from 7.7.0 before 7.13.5, from 8.0.0 before 8.0.3, from 8.1.0 before 8.1.2, and from 8.2.0 before 8.2.3 are affected by this vulnerability.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceServer-side template injection (SSTI) vulnerability in Jira Server and Data Center's ContactAdministrators and SendBulkMail actions allows remote attackers to inject malicious template code that results in arbitrary code execution on the underlying system.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 4.4, < 7.6.14>= 7.7.0, < 7.13.5>= 8.0.0, < 8.0.3>= 8.1.0, < 8.1.2>= 8.2.0, < 8.2.3CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify Jira installation versionCheck the Jira footer in the web UI, or access the /about.jspa page while logged in as an administrator, or check the <jira-install>/atlassian-jira/WEB-INF/classes/application-info.xml file if you have file system accessAffected if Version falls within any of these ranges: >= 4.4 and < 7.6.14; >= 7.7.0 and < 7.13.5; >= 8.0.0 and < 8.0.3; >= 8.1.0 and < 8.1.2; >= 8.2.0 and < 8.2.3
-
Confirm exposed web accessVerify that the Jira web interface is accessible over the network. This vulnerability can be exploited remotely if the /secure/ContactAdministrators.jspa or /secure/SendBulkMail.jspa endpoints are reachable without additional authentication beyond normal Jira loginAffected if The affected endpoints are reachable from a network location where an attacker could send HTTP requests
-
Verify vulnerable endpoint accessibilityAttempt to access the ContactAdministrators action by navigating to or sending a request for /secure/ContactAdministrators.jspa. Similarly check /secure/SendBulkMail.jspa. If these pages load or respond, the endpoints are exposedAffected if Either endpoint responds and accepts input, indicating the SSTI attack surface is present
You are affected if your Jira Server or Data Center version falls within the vulnerable version ranges AND the ContactAdministrators or SendBulkMail endpoints are accessible to an attacker who can send HTTP requests to your Jira instance.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped7.6.147.13.58.0.3
Upgrade Jira Server or Data Center to the patched versions (7.6.14, 7.13.5, 8.0.3, 8.1.2, or 8.2.3 or later). Until patched, restrict network access to Jira administration interfaces and consider disabling the affected actions.
Upgrade to Jira 7.6.14, 7.13.5, 8.0.3, 8.1.2, 8.2.3, or later
- 1. Identify the current Jira Server or Data Center version by navigating to Jira Administration > System > System Info or checking the /rest/api/2/serverInfo endpoint
- 2. Review the Atlassian upgrade guide and release notes for your target version to understand any breaking changes or required pre-upgrade steps
- 3. Perform a full backup of the Jira database and home directory according to Atlassian's documentation
- 4. If upgrading across major version ranges (e.g., 7.x to 8.x), set up a staging environment to test applications, plugins, and integrations
- 5. Download the appropriate fixed version from Atlassian: 7.6.14, 7.13.5, 8.0.3, 8.1.2, or 8.2.3 (or later)
- 6. Stop the Jira service
- 7. Follow Atlassian's upgrade instructions to install the new version
- 8. Start the Jira service and verify the upgrade was successful
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing8.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $6,656.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2019-11581 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2019-11581 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data