CVE-2019-11628
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedAn issue was discovered in QlikView Server before 11.20 SR19, 12.00 and 12.10 before 12.10 SR11, 12.20 before SR9, and 12.30 before SR2; and Qlik Sense Enterprise and Qlik Analytics Platform installations that lack these patch levels: February 2018 Patch 4, April 2018 Patch 3, June 2018 Patch 3, September 2018 Patch 4, November 2018 Patch 4, or February 2019 Patch 2. An authenticated user may be able to bypass intended file-read restrictions via crafted Browser requests.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThis vulnerability allows authenticated users to bypass intended file-read restrictions in QlikView Server and Qlik Sense Enterprise through crafted HTTP Browser requests. The issue is a path traversal or authorization bypass that permits unauthorized file system access by manipulating request parameters.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 11.20= 12.00= 12.10= 12.20= 12.30= april_2018= february_2018= february_2019= june_2017= june_2018= november_2017= november_2018= september_2017= september_2018= april_2018= february_2018= february_2019= june_2017= june_2018= november_2017= november_2018= september_2017= september_2018CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify installed Qlik product versionAccess the Qlik Management Console (QMC) or the about page of the Qlik web interface (typically at /qmc/about or /hub/about) to view the exact version and build number of the installed Qlik softwareAffected if The displayed version matches any of the following: QlikView Server 11.20, 12.00, 12.10, 12.20, or 12.30; Qlik Analytics or Qlik Sense versions april_2018, february_2018, february_2019, june_2017, june_2018, november_2017, november_2018, september_2017, or september_2018
-
Confirm web access is enabledVerify that the Qlik web service (Qlik Sense Proxy Service or QlikView Web Server) is running and accessible by attempting to reach the login page via HTTP/HTTPS on the standard Qlik ports (typically 80/443 or 4242/4747)Affected if The web interface is accessible without network restrictions, meaning an authenticated user could potentially send crafted HTTP requests to the server
-
Verify authentication is configuredCheck that Qlik authentication is properly configured and that the server allows user logins through the QMC or directory service configurationsAffected if User authentication is enabled and functional, which is required for this vulnerability to be exploitable (the flaw affects authenticated users)
-
Check for existing patchesReview the currently installed version against the patched versions: QlikView Server should be at SR19 (11.20), SR11 (12.10), SR9 (12.20), or SR2 (12.30); Qlik Sense should have Patch 4 or higher for February/April/June/September/November 2018, or Patch 2 for February 2019Affected if The installed version is below these patch levels, indicating the security fix has not been applied
You are affected if your QlikView Server or Qlik Sense installation version matches any of the listed affected versions and the web interface with authentication is enabled.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataApply the vendor-provided patches: QlikView Server to SR19, 12.10 SR11, 12.20 SR9, or 12.30 SR2; Qlik Sense installations to February 2018 Patch 4, April 2018 Patch 3, June 2018 Patch 3, September 2018 Patch 4, November 2018 Patch 4, or February 2019 Patch 2.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,088.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2019-11628 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2019-11628 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data