CVE-2019-11740
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedMozilla developers and community members reported memory safety bugs present in Firefox 68, Firefox ESR 68, and Firefox 60.8. Some of these bugs showed evidence of memory corruption and we presume that with enough effort that some of these could be exploited to run arbitrary code. This vulnerability affects Firefox < 69, Thunderbird < 68.1, Thunderbird < 60.9, Firefox ESR < 60.9, and Firefox ESR < 68.1.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceMemory safety bugs in Firefox and Thunderbird that allow memory corruption and potentially arbitrary code execution via crafted web content.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 60.9.0< 69.0>= 68.0, < 68.1.0= 16.04= 18.04= 19.04< 60.9.0>= 68.0, < 68.1.0= 15.0= 15.1CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check installed Firefox versionOpen Firefox, navigate to Menu > Help > About Firefox, or run `firefox --version` from command lineAffected if Version is below 60.9.0, or between 60.9.0 and 68.x (inclusive of 68.0 but below 68.1), or below 69.0 for non-ESR versions before 60.9.0
-
Check installed Firefox ESR versionOpen Firefox ESR, navigate to Menu > Help > About Firefox ESR, or run `firefox-esr --version` from command lineAffected if Version is 68.0 through 68.0.x (anything >= 68.0 but < 68.1.0)
-
Check installed Thunderbird versionOpen Thunderbird, navigate to Menu > Help > About Thunderbird, or run `thunderbird --version` from command lineAffected if Version is below 60.9.0, or between 60.9.0 and 68.x (inclusive of 68.0 but below 68.1)
-
Check Ubuntu system packages for Firefox/ThunderbirdRun `dpkg -l | grep firefox` or `dpkg -l | grep thunderbird` on Debian/Ubuntu systemsAffected if Installed package version corresponds to vulnerable Firefox/Thunderbird versions per the affected ranges above
You are affected if any installed Firefox or Thunderbird version falls within the vulnerable ranges: Firefox < 60.9.0, Firefox < 69.0, Firefox ESR 68.0-68.0.x, Thunderbird < 60.9.0, or Thunderbird 68.0-68.0.x.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor data60.9.068.1.069.0
Upgrade affected software to patched versions: Firefox 69+, Thunderbird 68.1+/60.9+, Firefox ESR 68.1+/60.9+.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation1.0 h
- Testing1.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,456.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2019-11740 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2019-11740 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data