CVE-2019-11760
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA fixed-size stack buffer could overflow in nrappkit when doing WebRTC signaling. This resulted in a potentially exploitable crash in some instances. This vulnerability affects Firefox < 70, Thunderbird < 68.2, and Firefox ESR < 68.2.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceA fixed-size stack buffer overflow vulnerability exists in nrappkit during WebRTC signaling processing. The overflow occurs due to insufficient bounds checking when handling signaling data, potentially allowing an attacker to overwrite adjacent stack memory and cause a crash or achieve code execution.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 70.0< 68.2= 16.04< 68.2CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check Firefox versionRun 'firefox --version' or go to Help > About Firefox to view the installed version numberAffected if Version is below 70.0 (for regular Firefox) or below 68.2 (for Firefox ESR)
-
Check Thunderbird versionRun 'thunderbird --version' or go to Help > About Thunderbird to view the installed version numberAffected if Version is below 68.2
-
Verify WebRTC is enabledIn Firefox/Thunderbird, go to about:config and check if media.peerconnection.enabled is set to true (default is true)Affected if WebRTC (media.peerconnection.enabled) is enabled - this is the attack surface for the nrappkit signaling flaw
-
Check for vulnerable nrappkit library on UbuntuRun 'dpkg -l | grep nrappkit' or 'find /usr -name "*nrappkit*"' to locate the nrappkit libraryAffected if The nrappkit library is present on Ubuntu 16.04 systems
You are affected if you run Firefox below 70.0 (or ESR below 68.2), or Thunderbird below 68.2, with WebRTC enabled, or have the nrappkit library on Ubuntu 16.04.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor data68.270.0
Upgrade to Firefox 70+, Thunderbird 68.2+, or Firefox ESR 68.2+ to obtain the patched nrappkit library with proper buffer size validation during WebRTC signaling.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA3.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,096.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2019-11760 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2019-11760 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data