CVE-2019-11831
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedThe PharStreamWrapper (aka phar-stream-wrapper) package 2.x before 2.1.1 and 3.x before 3.1.1 for TYPO3 does not prevent directory traversal, which allows attackers to bypass a deserialization protection mechanism, as demonstrated by a phar:///path/bad.phar/../good.phar URL.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThe PharStreamWrapper (phar-stream-wrapper) package used by TYPO3 fails to properly sanitize directory traversal sequences in phar:// URLs. Attackers can use paths like 'phar:///path/bad.phar/../good.phar' to bypass deserialization protection mechanisms that rely on blocking phar:// streams, potentially leading to remote code execution.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 2.0.0, < 2.1.1>= 3.0.0, < 3.1.1= 8.0= 9.0= 28= 29= 30>= 7.0, < 7.67>= 8.6.0, < 8.6.16>= 8.7.0, < 8.7.1>= 3.9.3, <= 3.9.5CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check PharStreamWrapper version in vendor directoryIf using Composer, run 'composer show phar-io/pharstreamwrapper' or inspect vendor/phar-io/pharstreamwrapper/composer.json for the version fieldAffected if version is >= 2.0.0 and < 2.1.1, or >= 3.0.0 and < 3.1.1
-
Check TYPO3 CMS versionIn TYPO3, check typo3/sysext/core/Classes/Utility/GeneralUtility.php for version constant, or check typo3/sysext/core/composer.jsonAffected if TYPO3 CMS is installed and uses PharStreamWrapper with the vulnerable version range from step 1
-
Check Drupal versionInspect core/lib/Drupal.php for the VERSION constant, or check composer.json if using Composer-based installAffected if Drupal version is 7.0-7.66, 8.6.0-8.6.15, or 8.7.0 and uses the vulnerable PharStreamWrapper
-
Check Joomla versionInspect libraries/vendor/phar-io/pharstreamwrapper/composer.json or check the Joomla administrator about box for version numberAffected if Joomla version is 3.9.3 through 3.9.5 and includes the vulnerable PharStreamWrapper package
-
Verify phar:// stream handling is activeSearch codebase for usage of 'phar://' in file operations or unserialize() calls that process user-supplied dataAffected if phar:// stream handling is enabled and processes untrusted input, allowing the directory traversal bypass to be exploited
Your environment is affected if any of the identified products (TYPO3, Drupal, Joomla) are using PharStreamWrapper versions 2.0.0-2.1.0 or 3.0.0-3.1.0 AND the application processes phar:// streams from untrusted sources.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped2.1.13.1.17.67
Upgrade PharStreamWrapper to version 2.1.1 or later for the 2.x branch, or 3.1.1 or later for the 3.x branch to obtain the directory traversal protection fix.
PharStreamWrapper: 2.1.1 or 3.1.1 | Drupal: 7.67, 8.6.16, or 8.7.1 | Joomla!: 3.9.6+
- Identify the affected product in your environment: PharStreamWrapper, Drupal, or Joomla!
- For PharStreamWrapper: Check the currently installed version (composer show pharstream/phar-stream-wrapper or similar)
- For Drupal: Check core version (drush status or composer show drupal/core)
- For Joomla!: Check the Joomla! version in the admin dashboard
- For PharStreamWrapper 2.x: Upgrade to version 2.1.1 or later using: composer require pharstream/phar-stream-wrapper:^2.1
- For PharStreamWrapper 3.x: Upgrade to version 3.1.1 or later using: composer require pharstream/phar-stream-wrapper:^3.1
- For Drupal 7.x: Upgrade to 7.67 or later (composer require drupal/core:^7.67)
- For Drupal 8.6.x: Upgrade to 8.6.16 or later (composer require drupal/core:^8.6.16)
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation2.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,224.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2019-11831 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2019-11831 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data