CVE-2019-12261
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedWind River VxWorks 6.7 though 6.9 and vx7 has a Buffer Overflow in the TCP component (issue 3 of 4). This is an IPNET security vulnerability: TCP Urgent Pointer state confusion during connect() to a remote host.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceBuffer overflow vulnerability in the TCP/IP stack (IPNET) of Wind River VxWorks 6.7-6.9 and vx7 involving TCP Urgent Pointer state confusion during connect() to a remote host, allowing remote code execution.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 6.5, < 6.9.4.12= 7.0>= 5.9.0.0, <= 5.9.0.7>= 5.9.1.0., <= 5.9.1.12>= 6.2.0.0, <= 6.2.3.1>= 6.2.4.0, <= 6.2.4.3>= 6.2.5.0, <= 6.2.5.3>= 6.2.6.0, <= 6.2.6.1>= 6.2.7.0, <= 6.2.7.4>= 6.2.9.0, <= 6.2.9.2>= 6.5.0.0, <= 6.5.0.3>= 6.5.1.0, <= 6.5.1.4>= 6.5.2.0, <= 6.5.2.3>= 6.5.3.0, <= 6.5.3.3< 7.59< 7.91>= 8.00, <= 8.40.50.00< 2.2.1all versions< bs5.2.461.17< bs5.2.461.17CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the system operating systemRun 'uname -a' or check system documentation to determine if the device runs Wind River VxWorks, or identify if the device is a Sonicwall, Siemens, or NetApp productAffected if The system runs VxWorks, Sonicwall Sonicos, Siemens firmware, or Netapp E Series and matches the affected version ranges
-
Check VxWorks versionConsult system firmware version or run 'version' command if available, or check the VxWorks kernel version via 'sysVrio' or vendor management interfaceAffected if Version is >= 6.5 and < 6.9.4.12, or exactly version 7.0
-
Check Sonicwall Sonicos versionAccess Sonicwall management interface or run 'show version' via CLIAffected if Version falls within any of the affected ranges: 5.9.0.0-5.9.0.7, 5.9.1.0-5.9.1.12, 6.2.0.0-6.2.3.1, 6.2.4.0-6.2.4.3, 6.2.5.0-6.2.5.3, 6.2.6.0-6.2.6.1, 6.2.7.0-6.2.7.4, 6.2.9.0-6.2.9.2, 6.5.0.0-6.5.0.3, 6.5.1.0-6.5.1.4, 6.5.2.0-6.5.2.3, or 6.5.3.0-6.5.3.3
-
Check Siemens device firmware versionAccess device web interface or CLI and check firmware version under system information or about sectionAffected if Siprotec 5 firmware < 7.59 or < 7.91, Power Meter 9410 firmware < 2.2.1, Power Meter 9810 any version, Ruggedcom Win7000/Win7018 firmware < bs5.2.461.17
-
Check NetApp E Series Santricity OS versionAccess NetApp SANtricity web interface or run 'sysctl -a' or check controller firmware version via management CLIAffected if Version is >= 8.00 and <= 8.40.50.00
-
Verify TCP networking is in useConfirm the device has IP networking enabled and accepts TCP connections - check network interface status with 'ifconfig' or 'ip addr'Affected if TCP/IP networking stack is active and the device can accept remote connections
The environment is affected if it runs any of the identified products (VxWorks, Sonicwall Sonicos, Siemens devices, or NetApp E Series) within the specific version ranges listed, and has TCP networking enabled.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped2.2.16.9.4.127.59
Apply vendor patches if available; otherwise, implement network segmentation and firewall rules to restrict unauthorized remote connections to affected systems.
VxWorks: upgrade to >= 6.9.4.12 or VxWorks 7 latest; Other products: upgrade to vendor-specified fixed version (contact vendor for specific release)
- 1. Identify the specific affected product and version in your environment from the list: VxWorks, Sonicos, Siprotec 5 Firmware, E Series Santricity Os Controller, Power Meter 9410/9810, or Ruggedcom Win7000/Win7018
- 2. For VxWorks: Upgrade to version 6.9.4.12 or later, or migrate to VxWorks 7 with the latest available service pack that includes the IPNET security fix
- 3. For SonicWall SonicOS: Apply the specific patch version as indicated in the SonicWall PSIRT advisory (psirt.global.sonicwall.com) for your version range
- 4. For Siemens products (Siprotec, Power Meter, Ruggedcom): Contact Siemens ProductCERT for the specific fixed firmware version (refer to cert-portal.siemens.com)
- 5. For NetApp E Series Santricity Os Controller: Apply the update as specified in security.netapp.com advisory
- 6. Verify the fix by confirming the TCP Urgent Pointer handling no longer exhibits the vulnerability
- 7. Test the update in a non-production environment before deploying to production systems
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation12.0 h
- Implementation24.0 h
- Testing20.0 h
- Review / QA8.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $17,856.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2019-12261 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2019-12261 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data