Traffic ControlApplication · Apache
CVE-2019-12405
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedImproper authentication is possible in Apache Traffic Control versions 3.0.0 and 3.0.1 if LDAP is enabled for login in the Traffic Ops API component. Given a username for a user that can be authenticated via LDAP, it is possible to improperly authenticate as that user without that user's correct password.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceApache Traffic Control versions 3.0.0 and 3.0.1 contain an authentication bypass vulnerability in the Traffic Ops API component when LDAP is enabled. An attacker can authenticate as any LDAP-authenticated user by providing only the username without the correct password, effectively bypassing the password verification step entirely.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data
Traffic ControlApplication
= 3.0.0= 3.0.1CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the installed Apache Traffic Control versionQuery the Traffic Ops API endpoint /api/1.3/about or check the traffic_ops_golang service version (e.g., via 'traffic_ops_golang -v' or RPM query)Affected if The version is 3.0.0 or 3.0.1 specifically
-
Determine if LDAP authentication is enabled in Traffic OpsInspect the Traffic Ops configuration file (typically traffic_ops_golang.conf) or the Traffic Ops database for LDAP configuration parameters (e.g., 'ldap.conf', 'ldap.enabled', or similar)Affected if LDAP authentication is configured and active for Traffic Ops login
-
Confirm the vulnerability trigger conditionVerify that the Traffic Ops API is accessible and accepting LDAP-authenticated requestsAffected if Both conditions from step 1 and step 2 are true (version 3.0.0/3.0.1 AND LDAP enabled)
You are affected if your Apache Traffic Control version is exactly 3.0.0 or 3.0.1 AND the Traffic Ops component has LDAP authentication enabled.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataUpgrade Apache Traffic Control to version 3.0.2 or later which contains the fix for this improper authentication vulnerability. If immediate upgrading is not possible, consider temporarily disabling LDAP authentication and using alternative authentication mechanisms until the upgrade can be completed.
Fix this in Traffic Control
Scoped from the published advisory
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,408.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2019-12405 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2019-12405 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data